English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

don't want to find a cure because pharmacuetical companies, hospitals and doctors make so much money off of the disease?

2006-10-19 10:00:56 · 18 answers · asked by jim 6 in Health Diseases & Conditions Cancer

18 answers

Yes, I have thought the same thing but I doubt that it is true.

While there has been NO real prevention or cure as such, advances have been made in the techniques of treating cancer.

Basically, we still use the same techniques as were designed decades ago.............either cut it out or burn it out. Pops

2006-10-19 10:05:44 · answer #1 · answered by Pops 6 · 1 1

Absolutely right.
Not only do they not wantb to find a cure, but they make great eforts to disparage those who have found cures.

There are several cures available, with differing rates of success, but almost all have higher success rates thn radiation, chemotherapy, or surgery, which are expensive and next to useless.

This is an article worth reading for anyone who needs to be disabused of the belief that the orthodox cancer treatments with toxic chemo-"therapy" actually work. Since when is the destruction of one's immune system with toxic chemo and radiation therapeutic? And how does cutiing out a part of the body solve a 'whole-body' problem? Something to ponder while reading the article.


Take a look at the site below which explains many misunderstood things about the cancer industry, and has some natural cures too.

Cancer
http://dgwa1.fortunecity.com/body/cancer.html

2006-10-19 18:26:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No. I do not believe that because simply put . . it doesn't make sense. Look at all the people employed by pharmacuetical companies, hospitals, and doctors themselves who develop cancer. Since all people and their families are suspectable to at some point having cancer touch their lives . . it would be ridiculous to delay finding a cure just for money. Find me a pharacuetical executive or board member who is not concerned about one day facing cancer . .either personally or by family or friend . . or co-worker. Would 'they' sacrifice themselves, their child, their family or friends just for a buck? What would be the point?

The lack of finding a 'cure' . . . is not because of the desire for money . . . because the lack of finding an answer for cancer means that ALL human beings are eventually punished (including doctors, research scientists, and yep, even pharacuetical employees). It is worth the while of every human being involved in pharacueticals, research, or the medical field to find an answer for cancer . . for in the end it may save their own life or someone they love.

2006-10-19 14:21:56 · answer #3 · answered by Panda 7 · 0 0

Absolutely, cancer is a big money-maker for a lot of people and industries. Kevin Trudeau's book "Natural Cures THEY Dont Want You to Know About" is a good starting place. There already is a cure that does not involve drugs, chemo, radiation or any other crap that will definetely kill you, if you catch it soon enough. Rid your body of toxins and parasites which is the root cause of most cancers (throw out the microwave too) and use natural herbs. Do a google search on Essiac. My favorite website for healing herbs is herbalhealer.com
Believe me, THEY will never ever, ever find a cure because all they want to do is treat the symptom (cancer) by poisoning or hacking away at the problem. None of it is necessary. Treat the cause, not the symptom. Even if it wasn't caught in time, I would rather go the natural route and die with dignity than be a lab rat for some big drug company trying to line it's pockets with government grant money or keep the local doctor driving his expensive car.

2006-10-19 10:28:56 · answer #4 · answered by prismcat38 4 · 1 1

I think most of the money goes to research. You have to look at the stats logically. Survival rates are way up from what they were even just five-ten years ago. It's just a tough cure to find. Cancer is not just one disease. It's tons of very different diseases that have been lumped together. We don't know what causes it, so it's hard to cure it. We are getting closer though, and I still believe that someday, we'll get there, though it may be a while yet.

2006-10-21 18:26:05 · answer #5 · answered by turdl38 4 · 0 0

There are so many new cancer treatments that have been developed with those funds - many cancers have a high cure rate now, much more than 20 years ago. Pharm companies do make lots of money producing and selling cancer medicines. There isn't one single cure for cancer.

2006-10-19 14:23:51 · answer #6 · answered by ravenwood4455 3 · 0 0

They do NOT want cures to any diseases, the last known cure was for polio after that cure the federal government and pharmaceutical company had a closed door meeting and found it in their best interest of themselves NOT to find cures, it would put the companies out of business in the long run and the government wouldn't collect MILLIONS in tax revenue

2006-10-19 10:10:49 · answer #7 · answered by Ray D 5 · 1 1

there's a lot information right here, the glaring question is - the position do I initiate? properly, i visit communicate particularly about the $295 Billion that united states as we talk pronounced. All of this isn't somewhat given to "starving human beings" as you pronounced. There are different motives, subject matters, and so on... yet, with the project of homelessness right here in u . s . a . of america, when we provide to a community homeless guard or challenge, there are different products to purchase besides to nutrition. those contain construction expenditures, upkeep expenditures, coverage, electrical energy, and salaries. definite, salaries - the human beings who paintings there might want to opt to devour and furnish for his or her households besides. So, so a concepts as th $295 Billion, a lot of it is given to motives except homelessness and poverty. those might want to contain maximum cancers and different medical analyze, universities, church homes and non secular agencies, or perhaps the community animal guard. also, i'd be conscious that the $295 Billion did not search for suggestion from what American Christians provide. it is the quantity given by technique of all individuals. perfect needs.

2016-12-05 00:30:47 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

yes and i hope i'm still around when it finally gets out that they have had the cure and have been keeping it locked away just so i know who i can look in the eye and let them know what it felt like to loose my dad at age 10, and 2 find out i had his same cancer by age 13....

2006-10-19 16:57:11 · answer #9 · answered by Becca 2 · 0 0

Yes.

Also, they are looking in the wrong direction. Cancer has many causes in each single case, but the medical profession are just addressing the symptoms. They will never find a cure for cancer, by this rate.

Should you care to read my opinion on cancer in more detail, please click on "Dhaxem and Cancer" on the Dhaxem website.

2006-10-19 10:08:41 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers