The world is being populated too fast especailly the poorest countries of the world, at some point countries must institute some sort of social movement to reduce the future populations regardless of religions. China tried it and it seemed to help their future
2006-10-19 09:47:45 · 15 answers · asked by mohvictor 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Community Service
No God is Pro life
2006-10-19 10:04:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think right now there wont be any point in doing that. Poorest countries are usually the ones populated as you say but on the other hand these poverty stricken countries are usually the ones with high rates of HIV AIDS. The disease on its own swipes them off and fast since they do not even take good nutrition which might help them survive longer. I will not agree that population control be instituted for each country.
2006-10-19 10:41:29 · answer #2 · answered by mmadamor 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
government sactioned abortions, euthanasia...there is no humane form of extermination. considering a quarter of my generation's population has been wiped out by abortion, and there are now not enough people paying into social security, it does seem we have a bit of a population problem. There are not enough people!
As for poorer countries...it is not that there are too many people, its is their government's refusal to provide for and serve these people...in almost every case the governments of these countries are extremely corrupt. So rather than address these issues, it would make more sense to kill the citizens? As far as land mass goes, there is no shortage of available space on the planet. Considering the entire population of the world can fit in New England!
2006-10-19 10:16:09 · answer #3 · answered by Jon 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I disagree. The world is reproducing at their own pace. Laisse Faire, man. Chill out and let grown people decide their own fate and independently create their families as they wish. Nothing is happening too fast. If anything, governments are eroding individual liberty and attacking the family too fast.
We are all adults here, so let everyone to their own decisions for what is best for themselves and their families.
If you want to take China as an example, then please note their utter poverty and lack of freedom. Their ecological policies are nothing to be envied either. Sure their circumstances are improving very very slowly, but who says that government enforced abortion (an extension of their illustrious history of civil rights violations applied to the youngest of our population) is the reason for any positive development anywhere.
Take my advice and chill out about trying to stop people from creating and governing their own families. Anyone who has tasted of that freedom will raise their arms against you in a heartbeat, and you won't have a moral leg to stand on against them.
2006-10-19 10:05:34 · answer #4 · answered by Andy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a million. does no longer be a chosen if it extremely is going to take place then it is going to take place. (This scenario is greater possibly to be led to by way of or coupled with government the help of the government doing 2, 3, or 4, yet that they had attempt all 3. 2 and four are not possibly to take place via fact the unfastened majority could finally end up revolting.) 2. Over my ineffective physique. 3. is this some liberal utopian dream? 4. Over my ineffective physique.
2016-11-23 19:50:05 · answer #5 · answered by toborg 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
my initial response is yes, for the benefit of the majority. But then again, we have to trust that God has a plan and that all life including the unborn has a purpose. We were given a large plant to work with, we just need to work together to find eco-friendly solutions to coexist more harmoniously. Pro-Life!!!
2006-10-21 17:34:18 · answer #6 · answered by Baby 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. It is a must thing for india to follow population control measures earnestly, if it wants to improve the quality of life of its people.
2006-10-20 20:32:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Population control is out of the question. There are so many ***** people that sex is rampant everywhere.
Everyone is having sex except terrorists. They are a sad bunch though., already
2006-10-19 09:55:30 · answer #8 · answered by snorkelman_37 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think people with criminals conviced of serious crimes should be sterilized all around the world. Why would we want to breed krap?
2006-10-19 13:33:53 · answer #9 · answered by stinkbait30 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes , people in the rural areas should be provided with awareness programmes
2006-10-20 05:59:35 · answer #10 · answered by amithaa 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋