2006-10-19 08:21:09 · 22 answers · asked by iwant4wifes 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
well, actions speak louder than words.
2006-10-19 08:23:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No. I'm an international studies major and Islam is something we've discussed in class. The religion of Islam doesn't promote or encourage hate and violence. Its actually a very peaceful religion. Islamist aka extremists use the religion, twist it around and convince others that hate and violence are good. Christian extremists do it also. Look at the small church in the Midwest that goes to soldiers funeral holding signs saying 'Thank God for dead soldiers' and other signs that say that these men and women are dying as God punishment towards us, and signs that say God gave us AIDS because Hes mad at us. If you've read the Bible you'd know that none of this is true, just like if you read the Koran you'd know that Islam is a peaceful religion, not one that promotes hate and anger.
2006-10-19 08:26:56 · answer #2 · answered by miss m 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. That's a very prejudiced thing to say. A small percentage
of Islamics engage in hateful and violent behavior.
Islam is the second largest religious group in France, Great Britain and the US (Muslims in the US are ten million and Jews are six million). These are not even predominately Muslim countries. Do the math.
2006-10-19 08:48:17 · answer #3 · answered by Uhookah2 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In order to make a statement like that, one must be willing to aknowledge the crusades, as well as all other acts of violence done by persons of one religion against persons not of that religion. I believe that, since their holy book calls for "jihad" against "infidels", that the religion, though not necessarily its people, is violent. However, I also believe that all religions are inherently jealous and violent, hostile to the inferior outsiders who challeneg their version of the world.
2006-10-19 12:49:08 · answer #4 · answered by Tain 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're a hundred% top. part has basically been champ considering December. He has yet to have an prolonged reign as worldwide champ or WWE champ. He merits to hold directly to the belt for no less than some greater months. i in my view does no longer ideas seeing part win at WM via fact he honestly ought to probably be one in all the excellent of all time down the line and that should cement his legacy and be like WM 14 grew to become into to Stone chilly. he's an extremely stable wrestler and performs his gimmick o.k.. i will admit that i'm to no longer extreme on the Vickie storyline, yet part continues to be a great all around performer and could be respected for honestly living as much as his nickname via fact the suited Opportunist. i in my view have faith that part will maintain the call at WM. right this is how i think of it is going to pass down. The referee gets knocked out. The Edgeheads will intrude, yet Undertaker will fend them off and hit part with a tombstone. A 2nd referee will come to the ring to make the three count quantity and declare Taker the winner and new champion. On Smackdown, Vickie and part might have the 1st referee interior the ring, and he will declare that part grew to become into disqualified for the exterior interference and hand him the WHC. EDIT: To toga_man1, who has Undertaker beat at WM it extremely is bigger than part? Jimmy Snuka way handed his best? Jake The Snake? vast Gonzalez? King Kong Bundy? Diesel? Sid? Kane? enormous Boss guy? Ric aptitude way handed his best? enormous tutor & A-prepare? Randy Orton early in his profession? Mark Henry? Batista? the only guy or woman that Undertaker has beat at WM that grew to become into in his best and arguably greater effective than part is Triple H. something weren't even in part's league on the time they lost to Taker.
2016-11-23 19:43:01 · answer #5 · answered by clance 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no , i don't agree.
from the number of people embracing Islam specially in Europe I say most people all over the world don't agree on this statement.
http://www.islamanswers.net/
http://www.islamway.com/mohammad/
2006-10-19 09:04:19 · answer #6 · answered by angela a 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Islam itself doesn't promote violence and hate. It's how radical elements and the media spin it. And it's how some people interpret it.
Unfortunately it's the loss in translation and understanding that leads to so much hate, fear and intolernace, not just with Islam, but in so many other societies, countries and cultures.
2006-10-19 08:25:59 · answer #7 · answered by Bookworm 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Read the Quran and see for yourself. Or, read the book, "The Truth About Mohamed," and get the condensed version. Either way, yes, I agree. Not all Muslims may be fanatics, but Islam is NOT a way of peace.
2006-10-19 08:24:42 · answer #8 · answered by Spirit Walker 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I do not believe Islam is a way of peace, and for those that practise it is simply mind boggling, and just as mind boggling is how they try to justify what is written in the Koran, how could any one want to follow that kind of direction..
2006-10-19 08:37:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
strongly ..no. i think some of the young people are misleading. Islam support for the peace and love. we cant blame Islam for few muslim people violant act.
2006-10-19 08:27:05 · answer #10 · answered by Sekar 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yep sure do,some will say its only the radicals but the moderates back the radicals anyway.You never hear the moderates decrying the radicals,they just tell us how peaceful they are.
2006-10-19 08:27:45 · answer #11 · answered by frank m 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋