It's about time. I support the idea 100% It takes effect 11/18/06. Of course the ACLU is saying they will go to court to stop it.
2006-10-19 05:29:48 · 21 answers · asked by jim 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
The ACLU Can Go To Hell
2006-10-19 05:30:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
The real issue of immigration is the fact that we have a government that is no longer governed by the rule of law - and this is a TREMENDOUS danger to all Americans liberal or conservative.
When the government can arbitrarily choose which laws to enforce, and which ones not to enforce, and even which ones to just make up on the spot without democracy - we are all in big trouble.
So while it is perfectly legal, and already legal in federal law, the ACLU will likely manage to get a judge to overturn the rule of existing law (and the clear will of the people).
2006-10-19 05:47:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's probably not going to pass constitutional muster. One reason is that the responsibility for enforcement of immigration law rests solely with the federal government, not with cities. Unless the federal government specifically gives the city of Escondido power to enforce immigration law, they have no authority to do so.
It won't take effect in November, it will be put on hold while court challenges work their way through the courts, and that could take some time.
2006-10-19 05:34:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
well wether or not you agree with the law is what is being debated. The ethical argument makes sense. Is it legal, yes because the term illegal allians refers to some one who legally should not be in this country. It basically says if you break the law, you loose some of your privledges, just like if you are a sex offender we will limit where you live. From a legal stand point an illegal alian is a criminal.
2006-10-19 05:41:42 · answer #4 · answered by nigel 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Escondildo needs it, they have become over run. It used to be pretty nice there, now it looks like a third world ghetto. Last time I was there, we were lost trying to get to the lake, and it took us 45 minutes to find someone who spoke enough English to direct us. (the map was wrong, they'd built new roads.)
Just like anywhere that houses illegals, they take nice areas and turn them into shanty towns. I've actually watched it happen. Whole apartment buildings go straight down the sh*tter.
Good one Dildo, may the ACLU kiss my ****.
2006-10-19 05:34:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, by using the indisputable fact that would want to signify they could initiate evicting human beings in basic terms because they are immigration status is in limbo. the U. S. is a united states of immigratns. All politicians comprehend the want for finished immigration reform yet which ability giving those human beings rights, no longer deporting them. Undocumented workers contain 20% of our paintings rigidity, and are paying billions in payroll taxes each and every year. This idea that we'd want to continually 'deport em all' is brutally inhumane, and may want to weigh down our economic gadget. it is a pretend enemy, the right wing might want to like you to hate, that permits you to shop you on their area, similar because the abortion project, the gay rights project, the gun administration project, and different fringe subject matters that on your gut sound accurate, yet once you research the data make no sense in any respect. like each and every solid con guy they hook you with bait, and draw you into their scam. The Republican loose marketplace philosophy is a scam, truly they in basic terms opt to thieve you money. They try this by technique of adjusting guidelines in want of the grasping organizations that fund their campaigns and their communicate radio classes. organizations like Exxon, Enron, Phillip Morris, enormous health, and so on. you're helping the very those who're ruining your life and also you do not comprehend it.
2016-12-05 00:15:46 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is legal. Screw the ACLU. Illegals aren't Americans.
2006-10-19 05:37:32 · answer #7 · answered by Niecy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The problem is this Republican administration is spineless. They could have made it illegal to rent to illegal aliens, or to provide services like education, health care etc. without proof of residency/citizenship. But they don't want to do that, because farmers and big business don't want them to.
Show me any Republican politician with a spine!
2006-10-19 05:52:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Who are the good burghers of Escondido to say who is legal and who is not legal?
If a foreigner wants to buy or lease property in the USA, with the exception in a few states of agricultural land s/he has a perfect right to do so.
And if the USA hinders foreigners from doing so, you can be sure that the next time Hilton Hotels wants to build a hotel in Ruritania, they are going to be refused permission. Because treaties of friendship, commerce and navigation guarantee equal treatment.
That does not mean that a person who is not legally in the USA has the right to live in the property bought or let: that's up to USCIS and/or (for diplomats, etc.) the State Department.
But the only way you will successfully control this is by means of NATIONAL IDENTITY CARDS and registration of all citizens and their places of abode: just as is done all over Europe. But never, it seems, in English-speaking countries. One reason why asylum seekers and terrorists head for America and the UK.
Just try to work as an illegal, off the books, in Belgium, Switzerland, even France.
2006-10-19 05:33:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 6⤋
There are people who are going to be thrown out of their homes and may not have the money to move elsewhere. It's inhumane and nothing to be proud of. I hope the ACLU does sue to stop it. They've already said they would get involved.
2006-10-19 05:40:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
That's a dangerous line for the ACLU to tread. Illeagal Aliens are federal criminals. Renting to a known illeagal alien is harborring a criminal.
2006-10-19 05:33:07 · answer #11 · answered by W0LF 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋