swoosh was the sound of water swirling out of the pan
2006-10-19 03:16:16 · 6 answers · asked by andrew 3 in Education & Reference ➔ Other - Education
swoosh was the sound of water, swirling out of the pan.
Swoosh, was the sound of water swirling out of the pan.
Swoosh was the sound of water swirling, out of the pan.
I don't know!! That is a tough one for me! I like the first or second one I did.
2006-10-19 03:25:42 · answer #1 · answered by sshhmmee2000 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't see any need for a comma. You are not stopping the flow of the sentence at any point or making a list of stuff. If anything, an exclamation point after swoosh:
'swoosh! was the sound of the water swirling out of the pan'
Now, if the water were not swirling out of the pan but something else ... like a snail then you would have to break the sentence somewhere like:
'swoosh! was the sound of the water, swirling out of the pan a snail heard it.'
2006-10-19 10:30:21 · answer #2 · answered by Lumas 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i personally would place two for effect of sound after swoosh and after water.
2006-10-19 10:24:15 · answer #3 · answered by who be boo? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
After water.
2006-10-19 10:27:35 · answer #4 · answered by mickeyg1958 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
between water and swirling
2006-10-19 10:21:44 · answer #5 · answered by cameron b 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure, but I think it'd probably go after water.
Check out this link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comma
they give good examples on comma use.
2006-10-19 10:22:05 · answer #6 · answered by Carmenasks 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋