lol ok. how do u know this???????????????????????????
2006-10-19 02:41:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by chet 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
yes i do I'm reading Alexander haigs book and it talks a lot about how the public was deceived. there were 2 or 3 patrol boats that were in the area. the ship that was supposedly fired upon reported 20 torpedoes coming at there boat. the funny thing about it was that the patrol boats in that are don't even carry that many torpedoes. so Kennedy built up the whole incident to have a reason to send more forces to Vietnam. but then again did you know that in 54 when the french were defeated at Diem bien phu the us was paying 80% of the cost to the french ...
2006-10-19 04:14:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by stanyazfan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You sound like a parrot.
The Gulf of Tonkin "incident" took place over the period of a couple days. The situation was extremely confused.
You'd need to know something about radar ducting to really understand it, but I don't think you're up to the challenge.
2006-10-19 15:57:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Yak Rider 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes and the Democrats were in power when the incident in the Gulf of Tonkin occurred.
2006-10-19 02:43:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by FastFred Ruddock 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, what did you expect from a Democrat president? Truth!?
And the Democrat Congress fell right in line, never questioning the incident.
Yes, it does sound familiar. I remember Clinton going on and on about the 1,000's of Kosovars in mass graves as the reason for his unprovoked, non-UN approved attack on civilian targets in the sovereign nation of Serbia. Like his middle-class tax break, we still haven't seen it.
Don't know why you reference the loony idiocy of the mindless conspiracy fools. That stuff only fools the twits and psychologically unfit of the world.
2006-10-19 03:01:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
ok,so armed with that recommendations what are you going to do about it now? enable some different person attempt to "restoration it"? Are you going to write down a e book? warfare is a device, and any info concerning to the recommendations about that warfare, distinctly because it consists of the U. S., is situation to interpretation. that's how that's been when you consider that a minimum of the Civil warfare ( the warfare allegedly fought to offer up slavery - what a crock ).
2016-10-16 05:35:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by hinch 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Reminds me of the Weapons of Mass Destruction lie in Iraq.
2006-10-19 05:21:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Shiraz the Good 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Were you around then? Who was in power here? Kennedy--talk about LIBERAL!
What PROOF do YOU have that it didn't happen? Didn't think so.
Don't you believe that the present day killers are determined to kill us all? Don't you believe they drove two jet planes into the Twin Towers? Or is this all just another government conspiracy?
2006-10-19 02:58:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by 34th B.G. - USAAF 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Watch this link or that link. Most of these links are bogus and only want to deceive you. Why is it evey day a new one comes up where you say something and show NO PROFF of this event happening or not happening.
2006-10-19 05:50:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by fatboysdaddy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are stating a perspective not an absolute truth.
How do you know that the link you are passing on and propogating is not a lie.........
Just because its on the web doesnt make it true.
2006-10-19 08:48:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
*Sigh*..
Another Dumb@ss Democrat
--Damn Libs
2006-10-19 02:37:12
·
answer #11
·
answered by I Hate Liberals 4
·
2⤊
0⤋