He has served 26 years of his sentence. Do you think he should be released at his next parole meeting which will be 28 years?
2006-10-18 23:33:48 · 21 answers · asked by abluebobcat 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
He is where he belongs. He should never see the light of day as a free man.
2006-10-22 05:21:12 · answer #1 · answered by Gorilla 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe he'd be killed if he was released.
What he did was shameful.
I don't believe ha has a mental illness at all...Probably as Andy Warhol said..He wanted his 15mins of fame.
And oh how he got it.
If he were released you'd have every sick journalist wanting to buy his story and make him rich...
Where is the justice in that..He... rich when he has destroyed a family and one of the greatest talents ever born.
Leave him to rot.....along with every other waster who thinks life is so cheap it can be taken in a whisp of a breath.
2006-10-19 06:45:07 · answer #2 · answered by audrey_o 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Never. He carried out a pre-meditated murder, was and is deranged, and the person he killed had so much more to share with the world. I know that applies to any murder victim, but this was a world icon, and Chapman only killed him to make a name for himself. Now he's gone from Caufield to Jesus. Let him stay right where he is. For the duration of his sad life.
2006-10-19 07:36:06 · answer #3 · answered by Paul J.C. 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
life should mean life, does that only apply because he killed lennon?
if he had killed joe public he would probably be out now and move to another area, maybe a new identity, like in the case of jamie bulgers murders! life didn't mean life there and what they did was much ******* worse, and they are now supported by the state and have evrything they could ever want!!!!!!!!
if he is released all the sick jornalists would wan to interview him, giving him more recognition for his crime, eventually somebody would murder him, does that make it ok?
2006-10-19 08:29:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I can relate to hammy's answer! Musically, he did the world a favour, in my opinion. The fact that he killed John Lennon (as opposed to Joe Public) is neither here nor there. The question is whether he has served his time and is no longer a danger to society. If he'd killed Joe Public, he may well have been out by now. There is no denying, however, that he wouild not be long for this world were he to be released without protection.
2006-10-19 07:23:17 · answer #5 · answered by skip 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
what will happen when he's released some downmarket tabloid will offer him millions for his story he'll get to appear on some of the more dubious American t.v shows and HE will become a celebrity it will happen sooner or later.
2006-10-19 06:51:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Only if Bush takes his place, and then we can get Chapman to go after Rumstead and Rice. he he he.
2006-10-21 06:17:42 · answer #7 · answered by manforallseasons 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes! he was under a MK ultra mind control. We should release him put him under supervision and do extensive studies and interviews. CIA director poppy BUSH orderded the Hit on Lennon just like he did on Regan.. funny thing both assasins were dazed confused and were carrying the book the catcher in the rye.
2006-10-19 06:43:03 · answer #8 · answered by David . 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
This human slug has no remorse and worse claims to be "saved" by Jesus. He is still scum, a bent headed freak who should forever remain locked up.
2006-10-19 07:24:21 · answer #9 · answered by Frogface53 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nope, and if he ever is I'll kill him, he might as well stay in prison its the only way he'll live to be old
2006-10-20 10:56:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋