English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the scholars shows the proof of gospel that told the story of jesus and mary. then why we wont accept it being the truth despite proof showns. have anyone actually sees the documentary or just simply gave the answer out of our mind that is guarded by own religious belief.

2006-10-18 18:45:24 · 17 answers · asked by didie 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

17 answers

The Da Vinci Code was written for those who love blasphemy, and those who do not know or care what blasphemy is. This one FICTION book will TRY to convince you of all these Satanic occult LIES - the lie that Jesus was not God - the lie that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married and had children - the lie that The Bible is not the Word of God - the lie that The Apostles and early Church invented the Sound Doctrines of Christianity for the purpose of controlling the masses - the lie that The Church conspired to hide the truth - the lie that the true historical facts are wrong and need to be revised. One book will try to convince you of all of these BIG LIES, and get you to also be a blasphemer and BIG Liar, and make you ridiculously ignorant, and confused regarding the most important facts of history, all in just one demonically inspired book. Such a book was waiting for the last days of the great apostasy. The Da Vinci Code will be a benchmark standard of PROOF, in terms of a book to prove the great falling away from THE Faith, the great apostasy, and the great tribulation antichrist war on the SAINTS.


The apostles and disciples certainly did NOT die believing that Jesus was just a prophet or great teacher. The apostles and disciples died in defense of The Messiah's claim to be the Son of God who came to save the world. The crime for which Messiah was delivered to be Crucified on that Wednesday, Nissan 14, 30AD was that of EXPLICITLY CLAIMING TO BE THE I AM, THE SON OF GOD, WHO WAS SENT BY GOD THE FATHER TO SAVE THE WORLD. Jesus Christ, Yeshua THE Messiah, proved that claim by His RESURRECTION on Saturday, Nissan 17, 30 AD, from having died by Roman Crucifixion, even having His heart pierced by a Roman spear, on that Wednesday, Nissan 14, 30 AD, three days and nights before His RESURRECTION.



The Da Vinci Code is Satan’s LIE sold with conspiracy theories, thriller style fiction, in a romance novel for silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, who are ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. It is built and based upon the Pinnacle Satanic Occult Lie. This book affirms unbelief, will stop the seeking of honest seekers, and will at least give ground to demons, if not totally shipwreck the faith of any Christian silly enough to read it.



When something is presented as truth, which is historically impossible, one should understand that is what is called LIES. The claims about Gnosticism in The Da Vinci Code are the exact opposite of the historical truth. It needs to be unmasked so that people of THE Faith of the Lord Jesus Christ, and unbelievers as well, could see how shameful and unfounded Dan Brown’s Da Vinci Code is.

Lies are overcome by TRUTH!

2006-10-18 19:06:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Even Dan Brown states that the Da Vinci Code is fiction. There has been no scholarship that support this fiction novel. If you have any doubts, get on the web and search for Da Vinci code refuted.

After all this time, and all this research, I can imagine anyone asking this type of question. Nothing in The Da Vinci code book is factual.

2006-10-19 02:36:52 · answer #2 · answered by J. 7 · 0 0

In literary works, there are several distinctions. In this instance, the distinction is between fiction and biography. One cannot claim a factual documentation of someones life to be fiction if it is based on evidence. One cannot claim a literary work to be a biography if it is based on other than factual evidence of someones life. The author of the Da Vinci Code and the publisher of the book have both stated clearly that it is fictional. When a book is published as fiction, the author is allowed creative license... because people will know that it is only that. Many fictions are based on some fact but are not evidential. It is known as making the piece believable and thus, marketable. Educated people realize that fiction is not fact.

2006-10-19 02:01:28 · answer #3 · answered by reformed 3 · 0 0

the da vinci code is a work of fiction (not friction). He picked up a couple of facts, and suddenly everyone started believing that everything in the da Vinci code was fact.

Seriously, there never would have been so much controversy over the da Vinci code if people were just smart enough to realize that it was a friggin fictional book.

2006-10-19 02:22:13 · answer #4 · answered by chibibananachan 1 · 0 0

The Da VInci code correctly reproduced the events relating to Jesus' relationship with Marie Magdolene, and the events of 325 when the Roman establishment seized the name of Christ and his legacy and built on it its machine of control and oppression called the "Christian church".

But, it ended the story in the gutter by emphasising the sexual side of life, and with its emphasis on the female genitals, as in the book. Also the leaders of the groups trying to preserve the true teachings of Christ, like the Rosicrucians, did not perform public sexual rituals. It is slander. I did not bother seeing the movie.

If you want to read the Truth about the role of Christ in human evolution, click on "Rational Spirituality" on the Dhaxem website. It is the thinking person's gospel that will sooner than you believe replace the religions. It is available on the Dhaxem website.

Many people would not let go of their dogma, however striking the evidence to the contrary, simply because religious dogma is their crutch and they cannot stand on their own feet. And even worse, they cannot think for themselves.

2006-10-19 01:58:32 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 1 1

The History Channel did a special on the Da Vinci Code. Note that the History channel is NOT a religious organization, nor is it controlled by any church.

Their conclusion, supported by many mainstream historians, is that the Da Vinci Code is pure bunk (I.E.: it has no historical basis and there is no convincing evidence that it is true).

2006-10-19 01:54:52 · answer #6 · answered by Randy G 7 · 2 0

two things, first this was started because in the painting of the last supper the peron sitting next to Jesus appeared to be a little less masculine than the rest and the thought was that this person was Mary. None of the recognized scriptures tell us anything of this sort. 2nd the "missing scripture" I have often heard about was never actually missing, just not accepted as part of the Bible. I believe it is the gospel of Judas, who, was very close to Jesus in his ministry but was well known as a dishonest person, ultimately he betrayed Jesus for a small sum of money and set the events in motion that would lead to Jesus' death. After showing his true colors he fled in remorse and hung himself. So my question is, why should we let one person's story, who really had no credibility because of the choices he made, change everything we know about Jesus. Knowing scriptures like I do, I recognize that all of the important events in Jesus' life were fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy, this thought does not fit any where in the scripture. I hope this helps,,,

2006-10-19 01:58:11 · answer #7 · answered by Jeff 1 · 0 2

Jesus said that he did nothing of his own initiative but only what the Father taught him, he was on earth only to do the will of God and that was to preach the good news of God's Kingdom and provide a release by ransom or die for our sins, nothing else. To do anything else would be going against his Father's will. Remember the angels that forsook their place in heaven to have relations with the daughters of men, they are now reserved for judgment. They did that on their own and now they are going to be destoyed for it. Jesus never married and had children, that was not why he was here.

2006-10-19 02:01:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

a piece of fiction about a piece of fiction. Popular book and movie though. The Da Vinci Code is an openly declared piece of fiction by its author.

2006-10-19 01:57:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

There is no evidence that the da vinci code jazz is correct AT ALL!

2006-10-19 02:02:39 · answer #10 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers