you speak the truth. but what do you say we do? leave iraq now?
if we leave it like it is now then expect us to either have to go back there again or wait for the terrorists that are in the country now to get stronger and attack us...
i agree we should'nt have even went in the first place. at least not then... North Korea posed a greater threat then saddam and if you ask any terrorist expert they will tell you that the terrorists hate saddam and other people/dictators like him... so there was NO connection from afghanistan to iraq and the only real confirmed wmd was in North Korea which should have stop instead...
unfortunately thats not the case and we are in iraq and we have no choice but to stay and try to restore what's left of civilization there...
2006-10-18 15:15:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by john s 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
World War Two's ratio of combat wounded (671,846) to combat deaths (291,557) in WW2 was 2.3:1,
The same ratio for Vietnam was 153,303 to 47,410, or 3.28:1,
According to a DOD fact sheet dated today, in Iraq there have been 9,326 wounded and 981 battle deaths, for a ratio of 9.5:1,
Death is just something that comes with war. As far as how we are handling it in this war from previous wars I think we are doing a pretty good job...
Next Question.
2006-10-18 15:22:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by JB 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
of direction they have. whilst there's a threat. you attempt neuatralize it, or you counter attack. The U.S. has a "triforce" gadget set up with adequate firepower to make a retaliation. a million. Air/Stratofortresses. 2. floor/Missile Silos 3. Water/Nuclear Submarines. All with adequate nuclear palms and explosives to objective any considerable cities international extensive. Russia and China secure. i know I coated that by utilising the be conscious "international" yet in simple terms makin optimistic. i'm not sure what different countries could use to retaliate yet i'm greater suitable than optimistic they a minimum of a million/2 a dozen or so "secret" silos. probable activated the comparable way we do ours. utilising the "soccer". A 20lb activation cased with between the main trusted U.S. contributors. And the working lower back is in simple terms waiting for the QB's call. So ye. Our answer. in case you are able to not win, blow the hell outa the different group. interior the tip. all of us lose. yet whats up. Who cares? we are all gona die anyhow. Why not bypass out with a bang?
2016-11-23 18:46:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No i don;t love all the lives loss but we need to keep all those terriosits *** hole in the own land,,
as toby keith sings brought to you curisty of the RED WHITE AND BLUE<<< justice will be served,, when it is all over,, cause they will be sorry they messed with the GREAT USA<<< Iraq is a hell of lot better than when sadam was in power,, as least children can go out and play go to school,, women can work with out being raped,, men with out being dragged out of their homes killed,, wake up,,,
2006-10-18 16:46:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by thanks to our brave troops, 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Booorrring! You useful idiots never tire of preaching the tired Kennedy, Hillary, Schumer, Kerry line. I really don't know how you can say that Iraq was better off under Sadam. Oh, I forgot. You never lived there and lost any loved ones to his torture machine. Grow up please.
We will eventually be at war with N Korea and Iran because of head in the sand people such as yourself.
2006-10-18 15:12:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
I can't even respond to such ignorance, all I can say is I've heard your opinion at least a thousand times before, so it must not be your opinion afterall. I have been there I gave my life so people like you can bad mouth people even when it's at someone elses expense. Keep on spreading your false accusations, just remember that unless we were fighting there, we would ultimately be fighting it here. September 11 wasn't that long ago and don't think they won't try it again. I have titanium in my back, and would do it all again, and never bad mouth those that are protecting my freedom.
2006-10-18 15:17:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I would not want to die to give someone else a gift they do not want. Let them fall into civil war. Thats their problem, not our sons and daughters. What about sending our boys to die for something worth while, like actually finding that jerk off who killed our own citizens, Bin Laden? What happened to that prick?
2006-10-18 15:49:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Lmao..Wow your retarded..
Ok..As an example..Vietnam, Lost 60,000 and we were "loosing" according to the Democrats (Even though we still controlled S Nam and killed over 1,000,000 Commies)..Ok weve lost 3,000 troops in Iraq..See the difference?..In the World Wars we lost over half a million..Was that worth it?..Is 3000 lives worth the safety of 300 million Americans and future Iraq?
2006-10-18 15:14:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by I Hate Liberals 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
Hell, you could of fooled me when Bush said that the Mission was Accomplished I thought the war was over. 2500 American deaths later and it still isn't over?
Edit: after reading their answers, repuglicans don't you just love them, in denial and delusional, all in the same sentence.
2006-10-18 15:18:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I doubt anyone loves the war, but in case you missed it;
The Islamic Extremists have sent the message, convert to Islam or die. This means YOU too.
Bush is smart enough to fight them anywhere but here.
Would it make you feel better if it was 70 of your neighbors?
2006-10-18 15:07:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
2⤋