English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

. Compound light microscope

B. Transmission electron microscope (TEM)

C. Scanning electron microscope (SEM)

THANKS

2006-10-18 13:51:01 · 3 answers · asked by :) 1 in Health Diseases & Conditions Other - Diseases

3 answers

I vote for D -- a binocular microscope, since you can then slide the petri dish (filled with pondwater) and observe through the water, without making slides. Yes, it is significantly lower resolution, but I have to say that seeing the ameobas, parameciums, and other microscopic elements is cool. And once you have that microscope, find a kid with lice, pick off the louse, and watch him -- you can actually see the blood coursing through his body!! My, what a thrill to have that microscope!

2006-10-19 02:02:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That would be choice A, a compound light microscope.

2006-10-18 13:52:38 · answer #2 · answered by Min02 4 · 0 0

Light microscopy, as it will keep the cells in the pond water alive and moving. Other types of microscopy require you to fix, stain and do all sorts of crazy things to your specimen, killing it in the process.

2016-05-22 00:53:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers