Mount Ararat is 16,854 feet high.
For the ark to land within 854 feet of the summit, it would have had rain continuously for 40 days at a rate of 16.67 feet per hour or 3.34 inches per minute.
That rate of rainfall is believable, isn't it?
2006-10-18 13:57:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by scifiguy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only source I have is the Bible...sorry I couldn't offer you more than that. Maybe read up on it on some of the websites online. I believe I also watched a Discovery Channel special where they were supposedly uncovering Noah's Ark. I don't know what conclusion they reached with it though; however, it was very interesting. I guess it doesn't necessarily provide the proof your asking about...but hey, either you believe it or you don't with the evidence that is given.
2006-10-18 13:53:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sassy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
What source can you show that you are a human being and not a Yeti creature that has stolen into a cabin and is playing with a mans computor?as a matter of fact I am yeti, in the Yeti masters ancient, sacred, book of knowledge, It states very clearly.that we gave there family a ride when there was a great flood.they were floating on a camels back. and they came up with these lies about how THEY built the ark, no. WE built it.as a matter of fact we still have it in a museum.on the 79 th floor of one of our massive citys we have underground. if you would like to see it ,go to any large oak tree, knock 3 times, then 4 times, we will be right up to get you. human.It will cost you the use of a human female for two nights.bring her with you.
2006-10-18 14:01:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
nothing. there are certain things people have found that they say were used on the ark but no one knows that. It was too long ago there is no possible way to prove it. But I do believe without a doubt that it happened.
2006-10-18 13:54:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Joe D 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I found some very old wood washed up on my local beach today. You can see by the stains that more than one type of animal urinated on it, so it is obviously all that remains of Noah's Ark.
2006-10-18 13:54:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Would you accept the fact that it has been discovered on Mt arrarat in turkey just as the bible said it did they even had pictures on t.v. as well as in a magazine and it was also on discovery chanel and the history channel as well as recon photos and an expedition had dated the find as 3500 -4000 yrs old in harmony with the Biblical timetable is that enough proof for you
2006-10-18 15:52:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by gorbalizer 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not sure about the getting you the proof you want to see, but a deluge took place at one point in time...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_deluge_theory
But I've read somewhere that the flood was actually global because they found a layer of silt within layers of rock throughout the world. I'll post the links when I find them...
2006-10-18 14:08:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Bible says its real, so why not? I don't find anything that would be unreasonable about 40 day a global flood, then an elderly man gathering 2 of every animal on earth and returning them all to their respective environments. Do you?
2006-10-18 13:55:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by some guy 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Unfortunately there is not a shred of evidence regarding the ark.
2006-10-18 13:54:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
this is a good read
actually there is lots of evidence to suggest that Noah's ark does exist - including samples and photos of several sites in the mountains of Ararat.
http://www.arksearch.com/
2006-10-18 13:53:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋