English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-18 10:41:11 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Medicine

6 answers

NO, that's actually pretty small.
I live in a big city though...there are hospitals with 300 beds on one floor alone.

2006-10-18 10:48:46 · answer #1 · answered by svmainus 7 · 0 0

I trained at LAC-USC, a 2000 bed medical center at the time I was there. The UCLA med center is over 900 beds, contained in one building. So the answer is, no. In California, 300 beds is a mid sized hospital.

2006-10-18 19:09:18 · answer #2 · answered by mark the nurse 2 · 0 0

depends on the location of the hospital,here in India -yes it will be huge in some parts but a small one in metros.no ideas about u.s.a or an other western countries tell me also

2006-10-18 18:32:39 · answer #3 · answered by ABHINAV P 2 · 0 0

3,000 beds is huge. 300 is small to middle sized.

2006-10-18 21:24:41 · answer #4 · answered by mngrandma2002 2 · 0 0

nope its not !!! btw it depens upon the location of hospital, if it is located in small village or small town , it may serve good but for bigger cities its not at all HUGE.

2006-10-19 05:06:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

by US standards....no

2006-10-18 19:36:11 · answer #6 · answered by C K 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers