what amendments do you think are least important?

Question

out of the 27. what are five that you think could be gotten rid of?

Answer 1

Only one needs to be heavily amended to make sure religion never gains enough power to take over the government and plunge us into theological Hell.

Answer 2

I would not want to get rid of any of the amendments and none should be consider irrelevant. Some folks would like to curtail the second amendment and some would like to abandon the first amendment. It just depends.

Actually I would be very much in favor of Constitutional Amendments prohibiting destroyer the flag and defining marriage as being between a man and a woman. But the dems/libs don't care what I think or want

Answer 3

Why do you feel there may be a need to eliminate five of the amendments? They serve a purpose by supplementing each other to produce a society that is the envy of the world.

Do you have an example of another place that offers as much as this Constitution does?

Answer 4

i think of all of them are important of their very own good, in spite of the indisputable fact that 3 is semi-ineffective. i think of the 14th modification is via a procedures the main obligatory. that's the homestead of the entire faith and credit clause and likewise that which ensures the due potential of regulation. the government won't deprive human beings of existence, liberty, pr supplies devoid of due technique, and what one state does that's an argument of public checklist (marriage, as an occasion) might desire to be felony in all different states because of FF&C clause. The FF&C clause is what created this entire gay marriage situation. The protection of Marriage Act gave each and each state the skill to be certain no be counted if or no longer it would settle for gay marriage, undermining the FF&C clause. that's what makes gay marriage felony in Mass. yet no longer in the different state.

Answer 5

Partial answer because I feel strongly about this one.

The right to bear arms. This right is out of date.

Think about it- back in the 18th century a decent hunter with a musket was just as deadly -militarily- as a trained soldier. All you needed to protect yourself from an unjust government was yourself, a few buddies and your hunting weapons. However, technology has surpassed this idea-- now the advanced weaponry and armor available to our military make the thought of armed rebellion simply rediculous.

The NRA should say this means we should all be allowed to own fully automatic weapons, rocket launchers, anti-tank mines, and the lot- lobbying for anything less would mean they exist only to pander to 'gun buffs.' However, it is obvious that giving potential criminals access to heavy weaponry is social suicide. Thus the flaw in this amendment is realized, and it is clear that it needs to be modernized.

Other than that the 1st, 4th, 5th and 6th have been eliminated by the current government so you might as well delete them.

http://www.house.gov/paul/const-amend.html

Answer 6

The Seventeenth is downright destructive.

Answer 7

well, the on prohibition is sort of pointless ever since the one that repealed prohibition passed.

Answer 8

i like all of them but i love the 2nd the most

Answer 9

prohibition of weed.