What evidence exists proving the authors of the four Gospels were eyewitnesses to Christ's miracles?

Question

I want to know if the events, especially, the miracles of Christ, found in the four Gospels, were personnally witnessed by the authors of the books of the Bible. Stated another way, were the authors of the books of the Gospels eyewitnesses or were the authors repeating stories heard from others?

Answer 1

Some would claim that the Gospel of John was written by the the Apostle, John the son of Zebedee, but internal evidence suggests otherwise.

The synoptic Gospels along with the book of Acts (the second part of the Gospel of Luke) come out the first or second generation after the crucifixion.

Mark is generally accounted to be the oldest of the Gospels, dating to just before AD 70. It is clear that the authors of Matthew and Luke had a copy of Mark before them when they wrote their gospels, along with a collection of stories and sayings that are collectively termed "Q". The author of Mark is often attempted to be linked to the John Mark found in the Pauline literature.

We might mention that the epistle of James got into the New Testament canon in part because of its ascription to St. James the Just, brother (or kinsman if you prefer) of Jesus and first Bishop of Jerusalem. No one claims this today.

A great stimulus (and perhaps the greatest) for writing the Gospels.was the Jewish War and its aftermath, leading to the destruction of the Temple in AD 70. This sent earliest Christianity into kind of eschatological crisis, where the end-times seemed to be near.

Answer 2

It's known that John wasn't a contemporary of Jesus and his gospel was written late in the first century. It is also suspected that Mark's gospel-the first to be written- was used by the writers of the other two synoptic gospels Luke and Matthew.

Answer 3

The authors of these stories,as far as I've seen wrote them hundreds of years after the supposed events. I ,as far as know, received their info from legends, word of mouth. I think we all know how stories change from person to person.Think about how rumors evolve and after a time ,well, seem to become fact. These parables roots in no way can be proved or disproved.It's been thousands of years. Now,some will counter "these beliefs were handed down from scrolls that are thousands of years old." But they are based on the word of month" And they were written at least hundreds of years after the occurrence,if at all there was one.And Who labeled these stories the "word of God"?Don't mean to offend anyone. It's A MATTER OF FAITH. Believe it or not

Answer 4

There is none. It is hearsay. Furthermore there is no historical evidence that suggest anything in the Bible happened. For instance, The Great Flood is an amalgam of localized stories about flooding that were integrated into the Bible. Christmas is not the day Jesus was born but in fact a Pagan holiday of the Germanic tribes integrated into Christianity.

Answer 5

I understand that Luke was not an eye witness.

I also point out that Paul who was an apostle, never actually met Jesus in the flesh and yet he knew Jesus perhaps more intimately than even Peter. How is this possible, Jesus revealed Himself to Paul through the Holy Spirit.

Answer 6

Luke was not an eye witness to Christ's miracles. He compiled testimony from those who were. Matthew and John were eye witnesses as the were apostles and traveled with Jesus.

Answer 7

The first gospel was written around 70 years after jesus' death. They are all 2nd hand accounts.

Answer 8

They were not eyewitnesses. The gospels were written later.

Answer 9

ok so we agree that advantageous claims require advantageous evidence. remarkable claims require remarkable evidence. and that i’m sorry yet your evidence is pathetic. "the assumption, layout, and complicated info of our worldwide necessitate an smart fashion designer." and what do you recognize with regard to the universe? no longer something you purely throw your arms up interior the air and declare it to be too complicated subsequently god did it, yet you supply no direct evidence for this. a million. "no longer something in historic previous is greater advantageous straightforward or greater advantageous documented than the beginning, existence, demise, and resurrection of Jesus Christ" sorry yet that's a lie (ninth commandment btw), this historicity of Jesus is amazingly doubtful at terrific and his existence tale is almost a be conscious for be conscious plagiarism of the Roman god Mithras. 2. Our calendar became replaced 500 years in the past so it does not even tournament up with the meant beginning of Jesus to any extent further you fool. 3. previous testomony prophecies teach no longer something. of direction the recent testomony authors are going to declare he fulfilled OT prophecies, what's to provide up them mendacity? 4. memories of Jesus' miracles weren't dedicated to writing till many years after his demise, and there are human beings at present who carry out "miracles" in front of a techniques larger audiences at present. Eye witness testimony isn't properly worth jack **** rather whilst it rather is as suspect as that. 5. “C. S. Lewis pronounced that He couldn’t have purely been a sturdy instructor. He became a liar, lunatic, or Lord. He didn’t even come close to to assembly the profile of a liar or lunatic, so He had to be God." properly enable's see how could you recognize he wasn't mendacity? He might desire to have been. He thinks he can heal the ill and solid out demons it appears that evidently like a looney to me. Or he became purely incorrect. an straightforward mistake. You’re argument is that on the grounds that he became god he does no longer be insane or lie subsequently he's god. that's a around argument. 6. What? So he quoted the OT i might desire to quote you some Shakespeare in case you like yet i do no longer declare to have met him. i understand God is so merciful, drowning the finished worldwide. 7. back yet another lie. examined historic information frequently contradict biblical memories, as an occasion the story of King Herod ordering the homicide of male babies. there became a Herod all of us understand that, yet he died in circa 70 B.C

Answer 10

Exactly zero.