I think it's pretty obvious.
2006-10-18 08:49:46 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
For the sarcastically challenged,
2006-10-18 09:00:47 · update #1
Possibly but the hypothesis that the hyperbolic entellium spheres are actually conductors of superstrings has to be proven first.
2006-10-18 08:51:13 · answer #1 · answered by Chuglon 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Actually, no. This is along the same lines as proving God's existence through intelligent design. And proof negates the need for faith. Therefore, to prove God's existence would be to cancel the need for religions of the world. Hmmmm, that might not be a bad thing, though. :)
2006-10-18 09:00:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have no idea what you just said. It sounds like you're trying to fit a square peg into a round hole (hypercubes into spheres). You must have a few IQ points on me. :o)
2006-10-18 08:51:51 · answer #3 · answered by Iamnotarobot (former believer) 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Quarks aren't hypercubic.
2006-10-18 08:53:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope
2006-10-18 08:51:07 · answer #5 · answered by IdahoMike 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Congratulations. You can wield advanced concepts that only a few of us can understand and even fewer care about. And if you think it's obvious, why do you need our validation?
2006-10-18 08:54:18 · answer #6 · answered by Phil 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pretty obvious that this sub-space gibberish melds into sinusoidal squat!
2006-10-18 08:55:58 · answer #7 · answered by eantaelor 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think you've come up with a theory that finally mixes the "Big Bang" and Religion into one..........in other words, I have no idea what you just said.......
2006-10-18 08:54:45 · answer #8 · answered by justin k 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Crap! And here I thought it was always the "Big Bang" theory.
2006-10-18 08:52:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope. If God exists, why is he/she so shy?
2006-10-18 08:52:30 · answer #10 · answered by Breaking hearts since 1977 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋