Immigrants are not responsable of the failure of laws that allow exploitation and segregation.
2006-10-18 07:21:50 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Proud to be Mexican.
Proud of the Mexican-Spanish heritage in the United States of America.
Proud to be part of America
2006-10-18 07:44:14 · update #1
What immigrants are you talking about? Immigrants who took the time to come here legally are against those who go around the laws and come here illegally. There is nothing wrong with that.
2006-10-18 07:53:28 · answer #1 · answered by Niecy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We aren't against new LEGAL immigrants. Just the ones that sneak in and begin their stay here by breaking the law. At the last check, over 80% of homicides in LA County were committed by Illegals.
Foley comment... Cute.. Why not ask Rep Studds (D-Mass) who actually had sex with an underage male page (Foley only sent innocuous emails, the IMs were to a 21 yr old former page, he never had sex with a CURRENT UNDERAGE page), and or Barney Frank (D-Mass) who allowed his homosexual Boyfriend to run a gay bordello out of his Georgetown Townhouse. How about Teddy (hiccup) Kennedy who drowned his pregnant girlfriend in Chappaquiddick? At least Foley had the honor to resign unlike those great Liberals(socialists).
2006-10-18 14:38:30 · answer #2 · answered by Biggen 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey numnuts I am a immigrant I am not againts immigrants just illegal ones my family did it the lawful way so did million of americans. How would you feel if you stood in line for hours to buy a ticket and as the ticket window open a bunch of yahoos push their way to the front of the line the are not innocent victims.
2006-10-18 14:32:56 · answer #3 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's cut through the nonsense and see things as they really are -- not as the TV people want you to believe.
The 1920's inflows of immigrants was an entirely different scenario. How? The Ellis Island immigrants were going through the process legally. They were checked for diseases. They had background checks (as much as could be vouched for). There were also quotas. For instance, letting in 25,000 Irish, 25,000 Fins, 25,000 Danes, etc. They didn't just fill the country up with a never-ending flow of British.
Today, you have people from latin America applying for citizenship and are doing it legally. (Many of which are educated, disease-free, law-abiding, skilled workers.) Good.
However, you also have nearly 40-50 million who've snuck into the US illegally. Now, answer this:
"Is it selfish to not want to live in a neighborhood ruled by gang-bangers?"
"Is it selfish to not want to catch terrible diseases that illegals are bringing in?"
"Is it selfish to not want to pay for an illegal alien's medical costs when you have your own medical costs to pay for?"
"Is it selfish to not want to pay for an illegal alien's food when you have a family to feed?"
Etc.
2006-10-18 14:32:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hey moron, the problem is not immigration. It's ILLEGAL immigration. I am not surprised that you are too dumb to realize this because you are Mexican.
Mexicans are not exactly known for their intellect. You are proof of this.
2006-10-18 14:39:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The second part of your question is true, but it still doesn't give anyone the right to circumvent laws no matter whether they are enforceable and cogent or not.
2006-10-18 14:30:36 · answer #6 · answered by smoothie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't worry--The GOP always find a way to exploit-ask FOLEY.
2006-10-18 14:27:16 · answer #7 · answered by cork 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Of course is selfish....Lets compare this to Halloween..... big bag of candy.... spoiled child..... does not want to share not one piece....get the picture.
2006-10-18 14:32:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes...talk about your double standards.
2006-10-18 14:30:37 · answer #9 · answered by Jack 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
immigrant-hatred sure smells like hypocracy to me.....
2006-10-18 14:30:36 · answer #10 · answered by explorationredwing 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋