English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1. Why is it that life--or the ingredients of life perfect balance of gases, water, etc--are found only on earth? Why not on the moon, on Mars, or any other planet?

2. If Evolution is true, then Scientists should have found a rat faced gorilla eating his unevolved banana under the sea. This is perfect adaptation--to avoid competition from dinasaurs?

3. If I put all gases together, plus water, etc inside a tunnel and explode the mixture w/ powerful dynamite will the process create life, or will the mixture be scattered over the tunnel?

2006-10-18 07:00:42 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I have not yet found a SINGLE rational answer to my question. Only attacks on my person. Is this how you--Evolutionists--try to convince those who could not be persuaded by your proofs? Any contrary proofs to your delusion is from a moron?

2006-10-18 07:16:37 · update #1

24 answers

I don't believe in evolution, but was deep in thought about it a few weeks ago...
I was wondering>>>
If Darwin was so convinced that evolution is the answer to how man got here, then why didn't he explain how all other lifeform got here... and the earth, the trees, water, sky, etc, etc?
I mean, why stop at man? ...if he was so sure that he got that answer right, then why not answer the rest of the question?

2006-10-18 07:20:05 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 0 2

Number 1, there is no such thing as perfect balance anywhere in the universe and not on earth. The gas water and all elements are in clumps and imbalances. The amount of oxygen for example is now 21% but was as high as 30% and as low as 10% at times. Most of the water is unfit for drinking and life. The sea is undrinkable and the streams from glaciers and aquifers are drying up. The earth is inhospitable for life in general over most of its area. In fact humans are so frail that they have to create clothes and housing or they die in the inhospitable earth.

Number 2, that is a joke, science haven’t found everything and you are betraying with your joke the fact that you don’t want a real answer, you’ve already bloody decided haven’t you?

Number 3, You added too much nitro in your mixture when you put dynamite in your tunnel. Your tunnel is not at all like the shape of the universe nor does it have the properties of light and cohesive expansion that rules the laws of the entropic Universe wherever life is found. Your tunnel is in fact a model of the shape of the inside of your thinking process and vision, tunnel vision. This tunnel vision is a result of the universe cutting you off for natural access to know and truth through the air. When one believes a lie about the universe the universe thinks that they are suffering a malfunction where the spirit mind and soul is living in a failing body.

A physical body is a container for a spirit and a mind body and a heart body in that order. If anyone cannot see that order and realize that there are four bodies of identity that live in 4 dimensions of a multi-dimensional universe then the universe thinks there has been a mistake. The universe then in all correctness assists you in dying because that is a favor it is doing to help you get out of your failed body with its broken brain. The brain that cannot see the real universe as it is, is a broken brain and the body that it lives in is flawed. That’s why you can’t ask the question and get the answer straight from the universe.

The short cut to all your answers is to remove all your lies. If you are great enough to remove all Santa’s all Jew gods all Arab gods and Indian gods and all the connected lies and theories around them then you can become human. Please try because there are so few of us real humans around. Once you do become human you will realize that all this time religion has been stopping you from your super human powers. Your psychic powers and all the great things you can do are ruined by lies in the mind held as truths - the universe knows. In fact, you can know the answers to anything without any effort once you know the real universe. Once you know the real universe then the universe will support you in all you do.

2006-10-18 07:24:16 · answer #2 · answered by Mavro S 1 · 0 0

Nero, I notice that all of your questions are Atheist bashers. What's your problem ? Can't you just pray to you Gods without careing whether the next guy prays or not ?
Okay, Your questions No.1 Why is life found only on earth. No one knows. It just happened that way. You'll say God planned it. I say it's a plan of nature.
No.2 If that's the limit of your knowledge of evolution, you sure have a heck of a lot of reading to do. Ridiculing science might be fun. Let's try it with religion.
God is the father of the son, but they're the same guy. He's his own father- - - or son, however you look at it. But the father is not the father because the kid was conceived by a ghost. Okay, we know it happens in the best of families. So, Nero don't ridicule about rat-faced gorillas. Explain how three people are one. Or one guy is really three.
No.3 No sane person would come up with such a stupid idea.Life can only be formed by taking a pile of mud and huff and puff on it- - - - bingo, there you are. Logical, right ?

2006-10-18 07:30:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1. The right balance of gases, water, etc are found on fewer than 1 in 10 planets, that's why you wouldn't find two such planets in a solar system like ours with only 8-9 planets. There are very likely planets that can sustain life in many other solar systems in our galaxy and in other galaxies.

2. I don't think gorillas existed during the time of dinosaurs. Even if they did, the sea is not a place to go to avoid competition. There is competition everywhere. And the sea has sharks.

3. Life did not begin on earth from an explosion. It began during an electrical storm that formed simple proteins. Scientists have been able to do the same thing in laboratories with electricity.

2006-10-18 07:12:23 · answer #4 · answered by johnlb 3 · 1 0

1. this has nothing to do with evolution. The "balance" has actually changed dramatically over the history of the world. There has been times where oxygen levels were much different then they are now.

2. I don't really get this point. Mammals were far behind dinosaurs on the evolutionary tree, it was their extinction that allowed mammals to start evolving faster and better.

3. Again, has nothing to do with evolution. And I don't understand the point. Are you questioning the Big Band here? Because there was a lot more then just gases, water, etc. And the big bang theory does work for creating solar systems and galaxies.

2006-10-18 11:20:10 · answer #5 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 0 0

1. The conditions came first life adapted itself to the conditions. If life started elsewhere it would be adapted to the conditions there.

2. Evolution is random it does not follow a plan. Although there were no gorillas at the time of the dinosaurs, some mammals have moved into the sea and adapted accordingly.

3. Evolution makes no attempt to explain how life started only how it changes. Scientists don't know how life began but they don't think that god did it.

2006-10-18 07:14:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1) Are they found only on Earth? Have you visited every other planet in the Universe

2) Rubbish, ape like creatures aren't well adapted to aquatic life, so the fact that there are NO rat faced gorillas under the sea PROVES EVOLUTION

3) If you put the water etc in a tunnel, and leave it for millions of years you will produce life, that's how we evolved. You blow it up you just get a mess.

EDIT

You have plenty of rational answers, unfortunately you don't have the brains to see round your creationist blinkers to realise this.

Instead you see any explaination of how you are wrong as an attack on you, despite 95% of the answers in this thread having nothing in them that can be seen as anything other than SCIENTIFIC FACT.

EDIT2

BUBBLEHEAD19

Darwin formed his theories of evolution mainly from the study of birds and small mammals ........ NOT HUMANS

Which is why Evolution explains ALL LIFE on the planet, not just human evolution.

I suggest you look into this before posting complete rubbish

2006-10-18 07:06:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

1. The environment is not right for abiogenesis on any location besides earth and potentially Europa (moon of Jupiter) that is currently known to man kind. Abiogenesis requires a high density of hydrocarbons, an anoxic atmosphere, an abundance of water, and input of significant energy on a fairly even basis. Abiogenesis is not evolution. Its results are subject to natural selection, but the process itself is separate from evolution.

2. The creature you describe would not arise from any known principle of natural selection. This is nothing more than a straw man arguement, showing total lack of understanding of the facts and theory of evolution.

3. Swallow some dynamite and see what happens. Evolution is a slow, gradual process. This looks more like you're attempting to slam the Big Bang. Evolution and Big Bang have nothing to do with each other (except that evolution occurs a few billion years after the Big Bang and occurs in the matter that was formed at that time).

So ultimately, you asked a question about abiogenesis, evolution, and big bang theory, as if they were all the same thing. Next time...


Try harder.

----------------

Whoa, no rational answers, huh? Only insults? *glances up at his own answer, and about ten others above & below him*

You prove yourself even more ignorant with each passing comment you make. I don't even need to insult you, you do it yourself.

2006-10-18 07:09:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

1) We don't know that. There are many planets. Earth is only good for the forms of life that have evolved on it. It my not be suitable for other life forms. We have found organisms living down in solid rock that feed off of radiation and others that live in boiling water. We really have no concept of what is needed for life to form.

2) Where would you get bananas under the sea? you are just being silly here. Besides, they would have been easy pickins for the sea creatures that did evolve.

3) Where did you hear this theory? Sounds a bit flawed. If you have figured out what is needed to spark life, you should let someone know. The best we have been able to do so far as I know is create ammonia strains.

2006-10-18 07:07:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Does your community want you to criticise evolution?Why would you believe in a superstition based on a deity in our image creating humans for the purpose of watching us exploit eachother.That is pretty greedy and conceited for people to believe we are the creatures of the universe.People do need attention so they flock to an idea that compliments them as the stars of the universe!
1.Keep searching th universe.We have not searched every planet out there.It is too huge to explore.
2.During the dino age,There were no monkeys/apes.There were only pre monkeys that were scavengers.They evolved into the monkeys we know tody as well as us.
3.The mixture will be scattered all over the tunnel.There are no organisms in your mixture, right?

2006-10-18 07:16:41 · answer #10 · answered by Maikeru 4 · 0 0

1. Those gases are found there and you do not know that there is no life anywhere else. There is bacteria (a life form) on other planets.

2. That is just cr*p.

3. Diamond and coal are made of the same thing. Different ways of processing cause very different effects.

2006-10-18 07:07:02 · answer #11 · answered by Kate 4 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers