Since mankind is human and makes mistakes, doesnt making peace a goal to achieve peace set mankind up for failure? If one were to raise the bar so to speak so to clear the peace goal and many times over, wouldn't healing be a better goal?
2006-10-18 05:29:19 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
With healing for mankind, peace would follow.
2006-10-18 05:37:06 · answer #1 · answered by a_delphic_oracle 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Healing is definately a better goal because if war breaks out, whether in the world or with your soul, then there's always healing!
2006-10-18 12:33:35 · answer #2 · answered by Light 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Peace will always heal.
2006-10-18 12:35:56 · answer #3 · answered by Goddess of Nuts PBUH 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
healing creates peace while peace creates healing. hmmmm, very interesting concept. why don't we try it here and give it a trial run to see what happens.
2006-10-18 12:34:26 · answer #4 · answered by Marvin R 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Healing.
No peace.
No changed my mind healing.
No peace.
I can't decide this is too hard. I'd rather have peace before healing.
2006-10-18 12:35:56 · answer #5 · answered by missgigglebunny 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
World peace will only occur with the death of all humanity. Humans are instinctively combative.
2006-10-18 12:33:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
“Do not put your trust in nobles, nor in the son of earthling man, to whom no salvation belongs,” cautions God’s Word, the Bible. In whom, then, can we trust? This scripture continues: “Happy is the one who has the God of Jacob for his help, whose hope is in Jehovah his God, the Maker of heaven and earth, of the sea, and of all that is in them.”—Psalm 146:3-6.
War, poverty, crime, and other threats to human security are interrelated, and they are growing in number. There are no solutions to such problems. In fact, humans will not solve them at all.
2006-10-18 12:49:54 · answer #7 · answered by heatherlovespansies 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋