Definitely yes, N. Korea would destroy Seoul in a matter of hours if we did not stop them rapidly. They could also attack Japan. We would have to act rapidly to neutralize their military and the only way to do that is with tactical nukes. It may be possible to use MOABs but we know that they have enormous firepower right on the boarder.
2006-10-18 04:41:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, but it would cause problems for North Korea that they could not imagine, at this day and age, N Korea would loose in a heartbeat if they fired any missle at any country. Lets hope that this scenario doesnt happen though
2006-10-18 04:41:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by paki 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Great idea, fire nukes in the general direction of china, and russia irradiating their air and water, and possibly ours. tactical strikes aren't as great as our government make them out to be. We aren't quite as accurate as we say, and what happens if we slightly overshoot north korea and hit china. I'm sure that oops, our bad won't cut it. Massive invasion is the only way, and we don't stand too much of a chance since we are already strained in the Mid east. A draft is probably the only way it would work.
2006-10-18 04:40:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jon C 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If North Korea fired conventional missiles into either country, I would say no we would not be justified in using nuclear missiles.
Bush is a great leader he wouldn't do anything to jeopardize us.
2006-10-18 05:04:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Judge Dredd 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nope. They ignored me. in the journey that they hearth an ICBM, they are going to nevertheless miss me. they could hit a Russian Orthodox church in the Aleutian Islands, and they could hit Hawaii, yet no longer with a nuclear bomb. So some unlucky turd might want to get snuffed by technique of a falling dud missile, i do not care a lot. in difficulty-free words about one hundred,000 human beings die daily global, and the Aleutians and Hawaii have had a number of of time to guage the mild probability. If all of us receives killed by technique of a dprk icbm, it would want to exceptionally a lot be an coincidence. it would want to ought to hit someone quickly reason they received't positioned even a difficulty-free warhead on it. And hitting someone quickly with an ICBM is definitely an coincidence, you are able to't do this on purpose.
2016-12-04 23:16:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm more worried about N. Korea selling nukes rather than them attacking anyone.
2006-10-18 04:34:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by AGNY 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
if N. Korea used them on S. Korea, then KJI is truly more insane than anyone gives him credit for... They're right next to each other, so a good wind will have all of their hair and teeth falling out in a matter of days.
2006-10-18 04:32:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Chris C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think we should bomb North Korea with ping pong balls.
Just drop so many on them that they can't move.
Then we'll have their attention and they'll start to listen to the rest of the world.
.
2006-10-18 04:52:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by dirftwood22 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the missiles had nuke warheads, Not only SKorea and Japan will be affected but even their own country.
2006-10-19 01:25:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by JKT 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Justified, yes. But the libs would have a field day. You think they hate Bush now, just wait.
2006-10-18 04:36:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by only p 6
·
0⤊
0⤋