English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the whole of europe-yeah including little america(england)

2006-10-18 03:50:22 · 33 answers · asked by notaglumguy 1 in Politics & Government Military

33 answers

America would win - as they are already used to killing British Troops (and News Reporters) in war zones...

2006-10-18 03:54:08 · answer #1 · answered by E=MC2 3 · 0 4

If the this situation were to happen between America and Europe, their would be no winners..America has over 2000 IBM's and Europe have what is known as the secret navy who will be the only ones coming out of it alive...perhaps! There are never any winners in a war, the last war over 68million people were killed, if their is a third world war you can reckon with...that over 60% of the world population will be vapourized by the Atomic Missiles.
The other 40% will take over a 100 years to rebuild the planet because of radiation fallout.

2006-10-18 15:28:42 · answer #2 · answered by Le Baron 3 · 0 0

We Brits wouldn't need the rest of Europe to beat those dastardly Yanks. We'd do it single handed and then go home for a nice pot of tea! Bravo!

Or if you prefer a serious answer, I can't see the situation arising but if it did, I'd rather be on the side of the Americans. Not because I think they would win (believe me, there would be no winners)! It's simply that I believe the American nation is our closest ally.

I think the first person made a valid point regarding the killing of the ITN correspondent. However, this is an isolated incident and the soldier(s) who carried out this cowardly act must be brought to justice as soon as possible without harming the relationship that co-exists between the two most democratic nations on this planet.

2006-10-18 04:51:41 · answer #3 · answered by brainyandy 6 · 1 0

If you include Russia which is partly in Europe the US would have a slight problem.It could only end in nukes result would be a draw.The polititions who would have started this theoretical war would survive as they all have their own personel bunkers.Would it not be a good idea to have a chat about the problem in the first case .before releasing armageddon.We should be talking about how to resolve the worlds problems ,ie current wars,desease,famine,gobal warming,pollution just to name a few rather than a war between the US and Europe which is very unlikly.

2006-10-18 04:28:31 · answer #4 · answered by dink2006 3 · 0 0

Europe, because we would be unified. And don't forget Father England also has the Commonwealth. And as America is the most detested nation on the planet, I'm sure the rest would be only too happy to join us, such as the Spanish heritaged South America, and our friends China, with whom we dealt amicably over Hong Kong.

2006-10-18 03:56:10 · answer #5 · answered by SteveUK 5 · 2 0

Europe ,We are More Devious:
(Especially The British)
Without The British, it would be an American walkover.
The Only People More Devious Than The British are The Chinese.
Witness Diana, She thought She could be allowed to give birth to an Islamic Pretender to The Throne!!!!

2006-10-18 04:06:29 · answer #6 · answered by sorbus 3 · 0 0

Do you mean the whole of America or the USA?

Us Brits are capable of holding our own in battle but think of how easily the 'Cheese Eating Surrender Monkeys' of France and the other losers in Europe would buckle under a distant bang. I think your question should be UK V USA and the UK would win hands down. (Have you seen how fat the yanks are?)

2006-10-18 05:52:49 · answer #7 · answered by Rattler M 2 · 0 0

i might want to say that conflict might want to very last for a lengthy period u . s . a . of america cant stand adversarial to the military of Asian continent as China and India have the seventy 5% of the floor troops in the international, yet Asian block really lag in Air protection at the same time as u . s . a . of america has a extra constructive technologies and an outstanding air protection, yet technologies can no longer help u in prevailing a conflict. what makes a united states win is the self esteem and backbone to win between the troops

2016-12-04 23:13:21 · answer #8 · answered by wengreen 4 · 0 0

Well without going nuke, America would kick their butts very fast. I mean look at them, 99% politically correct, tree hugging freakazoids that are more worried about having welfare when they get old than preserving their culture and race. I think, except for England, we could send 3 troops of boy scouts and their target rifles over and wipe out the lot in about 2 weeks.

2006-10-18 04:19:21 · answer #9 · answered by Meow the cat 4 · 0 1

America (and I would hope the Brits were on their side).

Europe cannot even decide what shape a banana should be, so they could never take cohesive military decisions.

2006-10-20 05:12:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

America would, they would start by making a treaty with the Indians, to get rid of the Brits. Then they would take everything, shoot the rest, and re-write history yet again!

2006-10-18 12:02:16 · answer #11 · answered by ED SNOW 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers