English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

24 answers

Only against the fanatical right.

2006-10-18 02:02:18 · answer #1 · answered by tammidee10 6 · 2 0

It is on it's way. it is already gathering momeentum and has been for some time. Relion today has no satisying answers for people in general. 'religion' is a blind guide leading the blind and people will soon come to reject the hypocrisy of it all.
The bible foretells the fall of religion in Revelation chapter 17.
The harlot is the whole lot rolled into one. Every single false religion rolled into one. Just as ancient Babylon had over 4,000 gods so too there are many , many , 'religions' today . v17 'god will put it into their hearts '
Society ( and i speak as a British person ) from what i see is changing, and religious leaders like your bishops and ministers are watering down god's word, they lower god's standards, and approve of things such as homosexuality and condone it . Not only this but many of the teachings are totally unscriptural.
but the revolutin will not be one where i take any action, other than trying to help people to see the truth of the bible and what the message contained within it really is.
The revolution has been coming for a long time . It is a train. and it left it's departure station a very long time ago indeed and there is no stopping it until the end of all religion .
Revelation chapter 13
Revelation 17 v17 ' until the words of god have been acomplished '
People are so busy today just working to provide for their families , to pay the bills, t okeep the cars on the road , and accumulating as many material possessions as possible that the yhave no time for religion . as long as you are not hurting any one else then anything goes , that is the attitude of people today.
People no longer value marriage , which is sacred to God.
2 timothy 3 v 1-5.
anything goes, and that includes religion .

2006-10-18 09:24:40 · answer #2 · answered by djfjedi1976 3 · 0 1

NO! I wouldn't join an anti-religion movement.
All such movements are 'negative' and only play into the hands of the world leaders 'Power Struggle'.
Religion will always be used as an excuse to go to war.
War always BOOSTS the power seat of the victor and creates 'massive' wealth afterwards for the re-construction industry and all of it's sub-industries.

Let people learn by their own mistakes. No-one should be told whether to follow a particular religion, or NOT to follow any.

2006-10-18 09:06:51 · answer #3 · answered by Peter M 2 · 1 0

someone who is a capitalist shouldn't even be telling others that they are religious in anything other than money. Big business and capitalism is nothing but a breeding ground for greed and oppression. Wage slavery is another result of capitalism. Anti-religion revolution? How about anti-hypocrite revolution and let the religious people believe in there religion.

2006-10-18 09:10:06 · answer #4 · answered by Dusty R 2 · 0 1

Although religions aren't for me, I wouldn't deny others their choice. If there were a revolution, I would be suspect as to who was behind it and why. If it was for power, then we could end up being forced into some other philosophy that would be worse. Revolutions often mean fighting and there is enough of that in this world.

2006-10-18 09:10:36 · answer #5 · answered by AuroraDawn 7 · 2 0

Absolutely!!!

We already have racial problems, then now we even created "religions" to further segregate people from each other.

How is world peace supposed to be ever achieved? You have christians preaching that all non-christian are going to hell, tell me how is that going to improve relationships among the human race.

Also inter-religious marriages, ooohhhh, big taboo. I'm sure most different religion couples can tell you horror stories of how much prejudice from friends and family they have to fight through to be together. It's ridiculous! What is religion really teaching?

Stamping out religion will be a first step to create more unity and less hatred, less intolerance. People all needs to feel connected in some way, things like religion often tear people apart due to differing religious beliefs.

2006-10-18 09:17:07 · answer #6 · answered by jan 2 · 2 0

No.

To talk about an "anti-anything" revolution is a negative idea.
I would prefer to join a pro-tolerance, pro-freedom of expression movement.

In any case, surrendering one's individuality to a revolutionary movement is no more or less rational than submitting to a religion.

2006-10-18 09:02:18 · answer #7 · answered by bonshui 6 · 1 0

No I would not join in. The world needs religion so that there is some sort of conformity. Even though many religions are false. If there was no religion the world would probably have self destructed by now. Read the Bible, it has all the answers.

2006-10-18 09:07:16 · answer #8 · answered by Ron M 1 · 0 1

We, the people of the United States have already joined this revolution. It is not war as one understands war to be.

It is about using our system to remove religion from everyday life.

George Washington said words to this effect: "we must be careful of the wording of these documents, because a minority may try to use them to impose their views onto the majority." This has been happening for about the last 50 years or so. They, (anti-religion) people take the words out of context, insert words that are not there, say that the Constitution is a "living" document, etc.

And since religious types out number non religious types they use our system to change our value system to suit their own views.

Example: homosexuality. They want it to be illegal to even say that it is wrong. They want to force our schools to teach it as normal. They want changes to our Constitution
to reflect their views. They want the Pope to stand up and say that homosexuality is normal and that the church must accept it as normal. They hate to be called names but are the biggest name callers there ever were. They not only want our schools to teach that it is normal, they want to come into our schools and teach about homosexuals acts as "sex education."

As with all of our rights, we must look at the goal of people that demand change. Another example: Gun control. People that favor "gun control" say that is their goal, it is not. Their goal is to outlaw all guns and take away all guns from all citizens. That is a simple fact. They try to chip away a little at a time by saying, at each step, that, that is not their goal, but safety is. They say that the police are there to prevent crimes, which, of course, is not true or even possible. Police investigate crimes that have already happened 99% of the time.

So we are fighting this revolution right now and I believe we, (religious types) will win in the end. "Freedom from religion" is not what is said in our Constitution, "Freedom of religion" is what is said. From and of, have two totally different meanings and they know that.

2006-10-18 10:01:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Revolution has to be defined. Peaceful ones I would say YES. Because NOMINAL RELIGION created such a mental mess on humankind.
They try to nail everything and turn it onto a dogma. But they short of logical expalnation. They try to mock Astrology and other new age studiesbut their stories and basis are even more mystical.

2006-10-18 09:17:18 · answer #10 · answered by CulturedQuant 2 · 0 1

Considering atheists are outnumbered about 300 to 1 in most countries, that would be a losing revolution to join in my opinion.

2006-10-18 09:01:25 · answer #11 · answered by luvwinz 4 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers