In your opinion, which one has better maternal skills, Angelina Jolie or Madonna?
2006-10-18 00:19:57 · 17 answers · asked by Fragile Rock 5 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Parenting
Angelina Jolie.....Madonna was at the gym yesterday when baby David arrived in this country.....and her other children have different fathers....Plus Angelina adopted before having her own child...only my opinion......xx
2006-10-18 04:25:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A pastor once said, "You'll never know how good a parent you were until your grandchildren grow up." That being said I would have to say Madonna. I love Angelina for her humanitarian work but I don't know that the constant jet setting is the best thing for her children. Sure they get the benefit of being exposed to many cultures but there is also something to be said about stability in a childs life. As far as I can see Madonna's children seem to be on a more consistent schedule of between England and the US. In the end it doesn't matter as long as both of them are loving and supportive mothers.
2006-10-18 00:31:27 · answer #2 · answered by BarbKor 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Angelina is fabulous parent, but since many, many of the parents on planet earth are totally inadequate, violent and or non-supportive of their children . . . it is hard to make fair judgments. Someone needs to pump birth control into the drinking water supplies until the slacker adults grow up and become responsible. ANYONE who takes on the job of caring for children is a hero.
2006-10-18 00:33:14 · answer #3 · answered by kate 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably Madonna but the real fact is - the best Mums are the ones that are more concerned with their children's development than make-up, career or earnings, and sometimes they might even look a little frumpy too.
2006-10-18 00:28:26 · answer #4 · answered by Kble 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither really the kids seem to spend to much time with a nanny and the mother seems to work to much when lets face they have no need to at all.
Other than that I cant really pass judgement as I havent seen them personally with their kids, I am sure like the rest of mums around the try their best.
2006-10-18 00:24:01 · answer #5 · answered by Sara P 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. They have nannies and child minders for everything. Surely it would of been better for the whole community / country if they had just donated money or had a school built or something, but o just take 1 child out of the country and give him a better life seems a bit f*****d up to me (simply my opinion tho)
2006-10-18 00:23:46 · answer #6 · answered by splandastic 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When have we ever seen them showing maternal skills?
Carrying a child around like a handbag is not a maternal skill.
Just becuase someone is loaded doesnt mean they are a good
parent.
2006-10-18 00:23:20 · answer #7 · answered by sue66fun 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's NOT about Maternal Skills!
It's the New Millionairess 'Must-Have' Fashion Accessory!
2006-10-18 00:21:50 · answer #8 · answered by J. Charles 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
think they are both just trying to do their best for disadvantaged kiddies but how many must there be in their own countries?
if joe public is banned from adopting abroad it should include celebs too,
mind you i'd sooner have brad as my dad than guy richie, so ange gets my vote!!
2006-10-18 00:55:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither! Laura on EastEnders is a better mother than either of those two phoneys!
2006-10-18 00:23:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋