Lets see India what would they do? Well it would be the first time they would ever invade another country as India has always had Pakistan do it and lose. Well seeing that 10 nukes would hurt India badly if it was a surprise attack India would carry air raids because the ground forces are not as afffective as NK even if India's tanks are superior. India would use their nuclier bombs definetly. But if Nk invaded I think India is capable of pushing them out. An enormous draft rate which means like a lot of men
since India has a massive populous. Although India would suffer a little more casualties then the U.S.
2006-10-18 00:42:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I"d begin with moving the USS Ronald Regan ,the the 2 sister close to SK sea ports ,then tell china since NK has been you bedding partner control them or else there will be a very hot spot on hearth in 10 days China does not want any US military personell anywhere close to china or else give Taiwan some US nukes for safe keeping bet china would invade that little tewerp into submission overnite
2006-10-18 06:51:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by aldo 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is unlikely we will get hit. However, we still have laws in place that everyone has access to underground shelters and such.
I'd probably get some of that army radiation stuff- the syringe and the powder at least. I'd expect them for free along with the state of the art gas-mask.
That is, if there was a direct threat to Finland by a nuclear power, and I doubt it.
2006-10-18 06:48:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by dane 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Why should we ban a program in another country when we have the same program here?
Remember that with the ban on guns owned here and the concealed carry law failed, that the only ones to have guns are the cops, and criminals?
The United States loves to make its citizens defenseless so that it has better control.
Now it is doing the same thing else where.
2006-10-18 07:00:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by someones_gottadoit 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
The nuclear arms race ended with hiroshima and the devastating results, thats why the ban on nuclear weapon at all cost enforced by the UN and agreed to by all the major powers, can you imagine the atom bomb in the hands of madmen like Hussein, pyongyang,or chavez.
2006-10-18 06:52:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by larryclay2006 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Our Australian Prime Minister, John Napoleon Howard, would ring George W Bush up and asked him , George what do you want me to do. Why? Because our Napoleon is a man (if you can call him that) of few profound ideas and a follower, a follower of the latest opinion polls.
2006-10-18 06:53:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
We will continue to give warning until we knew the situation had escualted and then we would prob move in and take matters into our own hands. We basically have full military control over S Korea so it wouldnt be hard to move more troops over there and then start to move through the DMZ.
2006-10-18 06:42:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by JB 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
No my friend, if usa attack north korea soth of the america could destroy by the nuke bombs and usa can't do anything else just can stay and watch!!!
2006-10-18 07:54:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Go ahead and fry the entire country.
2006-10-18 06:49:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by kitty fresh & hissin' crew 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
we would probly move our troops out of asia, and nuke them if they pose a threat of using nukes in asia. we used them before.
2006-10-18 08:05:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by used1goods 4
·
0⤊
1⤋