Yes- The buddhist and Hindus are not just religions but they are forms of education in which they both teach UNITY.
Instead of arguing on what is the real name for God or what book is true and what is false- the principles in Hinduism and Buddhism teaches that there are many ways to approach Nirvana or enlightment but the way must be just, pure, and non-offensive.
Also it teaches peace and respect and giving without being judgemental. They don't even condemn the atheist because by setting an example of love and fiendship to others is how our religion is truly expressed and shared. Hindus and Buddhist follow this example.
2006-10-17 19:04:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Adrian Navindra 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
So, much to say here I don't really know where to start. First of all, the Muslims and Jews in the Middle East and in the land of Palestine seemed to get along with each other just fine - for hundreds of years - prior to the mid-1900's or so. Secondly, although I am only a Jew by birth and not by practice I must have been out with attagirl when the "Temple Memo" was released. Thirdly, I'm not all all sure why Buddhists were included in the question, but even as a non-practicing Jew, I can attest that an awful lot of the prophecies of the Bible have be terribly misinterpreted over the years by Christian theologists. (Review translation/interpretation of 'messiah' aka in Hebrew 'mashiach' to get started.) Now, please don't get me wrong - I believe Christianity to be a beautiful religion that has served millions of people in the most beneficial of ways - but it does not exist in a vacuum. Many of the major religion claim the 'word' of their book to be the only truth, but when the messages are compared they all call for the same - faith, charity, tolerance, respect, kindness and compassion - for all beings. May all beings be happy, well and tolerant of all others.
2016-05-21 22:45:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, Buddhists, Hindus, and atheists have radically different views from one another, so it is hard to believe that anyone could make a statement saying that the world would be a paradise if everyone followed their beliefs.
But you are already being divisive. By claiming that peace would descend and prevail if only certain people were gotten rid of, then this presumes that the foundation for your paradise would have its origins in something non-peaceful. Get what I'm saying? "If only those fools would vanish, the rest of us could live in peace." Well, a peaceful person does not wish for the vanishing of other groups of people.
2006-10-17 18:48:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Gestalt 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
You said Buddhists, Hindus, Atheist are peace loving and caring people, because they weren't attacked... If you were attacked, wouldn't you go against?
in the fact, Muslims are the peace-loving, Islam teach it..
World would be a better place if everyone was Muslims....
2006-10-17 19:32:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Nadhilah 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is not relegion that makes the difference my dear. All buddists and major hindus are basically vagetarians.
You can see the animals which are vagetarians are making a peaceful life. But see the non- veg animals does not keep quite.
Similarly in human beings the mental phsycology differs from their food habits. Do not say that all christians, muslims etc are violent. It is unmetured views.
2006-10-17 18:54:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by nagarjunababu 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
buddhists, hindus, and atheists have no problems?
have you ever seen the sexism inherent in traditional buddhist communities? the social injustices found in hinduism? what about nations such as china which are officially secular, and religious minorites are oppressed?
i have a better idea. how about we all stop whining about other peoples choice or lack of chioce of religion. thats the more mature course of action, instead of just erasing all religions except a few just because you happen to hold a grudge against them.
2006-10-17 19:00:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Maybe you'd prefer to live under a caste system like the Hindu's use?
But really, do you think that non-Muslims, non-Christians, and non-Jews are bettter people, less prone to power seeking or coersion?
People are people. For the mass, their faiths do not make them better people.
2006-10-17 18:50:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Susan M 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
there needs to be a balance cause there is such a thing as to much peace, so we need to be peaceful when we can, but we also need to be able to stand up and defend what we believe is right. some fights are justified when they are for the right reasons. there are also other reasons that we need to have war besides those rightous reasons, there the concept of population control that you have to consider, if we don't curb our humping and slow down the baby factories future generations will starve to death.
2006-10-17 18:50:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Solomon Dump 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, just think how it would be with no wars at all, as all of them have been against Christains, Muslims or Jews. Everyone will respect everyone. And wouldn't it be terrible if we all believed in a lie? =\
2006-10-17 18:54:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Vixe 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Buddhist are basically Atheist who follow Buddha's teachings. I don't know much about hindu.
It doesn't matter about religion, but what's in a person's heart.
2006-10-17 18:47:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Reload 4
·
3⤊
0⤋