Thru-out the Bible, Prophets speak of the Lord's Day, or the Day of the Lord, [same thing], which by all decrees is yet to happen. And for Pete's sakes, don't argue it means, Sunday; Grow up.
The writer of Revelation, [John] clearly affirms that he was.."in the spirit on the Lord's day....". Now, how many MATURE CHRISTAINS agree that the book of Revelation revels things that WILL happen yet future, given the fact that John was taken in spirit to the Lord's day and told to write things that are and things which shall be hereafter.
Let me help a bit; Joel 1:5 " Alas for the day of the Lord is at hand, and as destruction from the ALMIGHTY shall it come". Amos 5: 18 " Woe unto you that desire the day of the Lord! to what end is it for you?" Malachi 4:5 "Behold I will send Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord".
Anyone that say's that all happened in the year 70 A. D.,must really get off the milk bottle and start eating meat.
2006-10-17 15:47:22 · 8 answers · asked by Royal Racer Hell=Grave © 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Point taken..daccofoo247..thank you
2006-10-17 15:54:20 · update #1
Point also taken, thank you Vij.
2006-10-17 15:57:39 · update #2
Hey! BE NICE. I have been off the sincere milk of the word for a long time and I understand clearly. You are correct,my friend. It will come to pass these prophecies or the hereafter.
Shalom
2006-10-17 15:55:01 · answer #1 · answered by Pashur 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Judgment certainly happened for the Jews at the hands of the Romans in 70 AD.
There were even reported signs in the heavens, strange actions on the part of the Romans, and the expected departure by Christians, before Jerusalem was encircled.
Do you deny that God used the Romans to crucify his son? Why not then, use the Romans to destroy the Jews who demanded Jesus' death at their hands?
As for Elijah, any one of the apostles could have acted in his role, just as John the Baptist did for Christ.
This doesn't rule out a future fulfilment, either.
It's quite possible that the last days of anti-christ will extend from Pentecost to early September, the same amount of time it took the Romans to destroy Jerusalem and the Temple.
Multiple fulfilments are routine in biblical prophesy.
2006-10-17 16:01:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
And Samuel stated, “Has the LORD as super savor burnt alternatives and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is greater effectual than sacrifice, and to pay attention than the fat of rams. For insurrection is by using the fact the sin of divination, and presumption is as iniquity and idolatry. for the reason which you have rejected the understand the LORD, he has additionally rejected you from being king. a million Samuel 15:22,23 the standard purpose of on a daily basis of a Christian's existence could desire to be searching for the face of God and serving him. Why watch television once you are able to spend that ingredient reading the Bible? Why play video games once you are able to spend that ingredient in prayer? Why bypass out to the videos once you need to spend that ingredient sharing the gospel with the lost? each 2d that's not spent questioning with regard to the Lord Jesus is a 2d spent in sin, and that's the appropriate sin. For Jesus Himself stated the appropriate commandment is to love our lord god with all your heart, innovations, and capability. Has absolutely everyone ever enjoyed God like we could desire to consistently? No. So we could desire to consistently never be complacent. All our unfastened time could desire to be committed to serving the Lord. we could desire to consistently think of approximately Him each 2d of the day.
2016-11-23 16:55:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Scott Hahn's book "The Lambs Supper" says that the book of Revelation describes the Catholic Mass. You should look at it. It is really an eye opener.
2006-10-17 16:04:45 · answer #4 · answered by Midge 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree this seemed more like a comment than a question... rather a challenge... but he does make sense in what he says; I do agree. I only suggest that he does not come out in a matter that may be as provocative to people.
2006-10-17 15:51:45 · answer #5 · answered by dacoofoo247 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't understand what it is that you want from these readings, they are, what they are.
What do you mean "must really get off the milk bottle and start eating meat"?
2006-10-17 15:53:26 · answer #6 · answered by I love angels 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What are you trying to convey, exactly? What you just said was not a question.
2006-10-17 15:49:13 · answer #7 · answered by chrstnwrtr 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
O-k-a-y.............now what is your question?
2006-10-17 15:52:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋