English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does this 300 million include the 20 million Illegals (Mexicans and the rest of the ILLEGALS from the rest of the world)...........
Meaning......... does this 300 million number include the 20 million number of illegals or exclude the 20 million illegals

2006-10-17 15:25:47 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

9 answers

They estimated the number of illegal immigrants to come up with the 300 million number. In my opinion it's closer to 40-50 million and we passed the 300 million long ago.

2006-10-17 15:28:25 · answer #1 · answered by 14Words 3 · 1 0

i would not worry about the Mexican and aliens -- no, i am sure illegals are not counted -- this would be illegal -- in statistical terms. like when you count employment figures -- you don't count the "mostly women -- nowadays men too" that stay home and do house chores -- same idea with the illegals. Leave them alone -- since they have enough trouble of their own besides people thinking about them in negative terms --instead of helping them be "normal active citizens". I rest my case on this issue, because it pains me to think -- that some people think because they are born in "free democratic countries" -- the rest of the globe -- could be forgotten. Long case. Back to your question -- enjoy 300 million. One thing for sure out these 300 million you can be sure that in 2-3 generations the picture of the American will change -- and most probably will include the "Mexican face". Facts of life.

2006-10-17 15:34:36 · answer #2 · answered by s t 6 · 0 0

It includes 12 million illegal immigrants. The forecast also includes their future children. Many argue that 12 million is a very low estimate for the illegal immigrant population.(20 million would be about right)

2006-10-17 16:01:33 · answer #3 · answered by rdsm 2 · 0 0

ILLEGAL ALIENS Are Not Included
In The Official US Population Consensus

2006-10-17 15:35:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Heavens, no. That smacks of totalitarian administration. additionally, you could desire to % to tell apart between international inhabitants issues and the subjects that we are dealing with in the U. S.. In India it is a great subject. right here we % a 2.a million fertility value just to sustain inhabitants. international places in Europe and Japan have fallen under that value meaning a hollowing out of inhabitants which will place an inordinate burden on the working inhabitants to sustain the international places' welfare.

2016-10-19 22:04:26 · answer #5 · answered by lindgren 4 · 0 0

Well, they said on the news that that figure was due mostly to immigrants and their kids. What does that tell you? Why have Hispanics surpassed African-Americans as far as minoritys go?

2006-10-17 15:40:00 · answer #6 · answered by goldielocks123 4 · 0 0

wow...still lost to China or India..

2006-10-17 15:34:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

and then some

2006-10-17 16:44:57 · answer #8 · answered by hayleylov 6 · 0 0

:P

2006-10-17 15:34:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers