Fat is ugly.
2006-10-17 12:24:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by sheeny 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think being obese is more unattractive, but it shouldn't really matter anyways because looks aren't the only things that matter.
How about the follwing males for example..
one is 6'4, weighs around 250, is around 28% body fat, and is a TOTAL gentlemen and respect girls VERY VERY VERY much
the other one is 5'6, weighs around 170, is AROUND 12% body fat, and HAS NO RESPECT FOR ANY GIRL AND TREATS THEM LIKE PIECES OF TRASH!!!
which 1 would you prefer now???
2006-10-17 19:30:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mz. Eeyore 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think guys can get away with being flabby and tall more often than being short and average build. For a lot of girls tall is a big plus. But there are so many other and better things you can be.
Good thing ladies get past physical attributes more easily than men. Any physical shortcomings you may have can be worked around by being an all around decent human being: thoughtful, funny, smart, well-groomed, well-dressed and sincere.
2006-10-17 19:31:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Merelda 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
when you ask your question- you're asking women.... i assume? So i say obese. However i went out with a short guy for a few years and always thought something wasn't right. It was his height- it made me look mumsie like and therefore i felt as though he wasn't too great for me- also he had a massive ego and thought he had to prove more being short- he had very bad ego problems. So i can't say i like short guys either.
I think that if you're talking about women then you're onto a different answers
2006-10-17 19:28:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by antagonist 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
oA person's weight and height has nothing to do with their personality. I really don't care which one of the above based on the information provided, I would have to know more about each. But if I had to choose, personally if I were short or obese, I'd choose short.
2006-10-17 19:27:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by cowboys21angel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither sound unable to deal with. It all depends on the body type. Go for whatever you want. If you're obese you can change that, if you're short, not much you can do except put on high heels?
2006-10-17 19:26:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Special K 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i dont think looks are everything so it doesnt really matter which is unattractive. just because they are unattractive doesnt mean that they arent goin to be a complete gentlemen. most of the time the unattractive ones are the complete gentlemens and the attractive ones are the complete jerks.
2006-10-18 15:49:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by D21 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think obese is less attractive. Being short isn't that bad, the average height of a female is 5'5.
2006-10-17 19:24:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd take the 5' 6" guy. I'm only 5' 0" myself, so having a 6' 2" guy would be way too off-balance. However, weight isn't everything. One of my friends, who was overweight, had a crush on me. I rejected him not because he was overweight, but because his personality (Yu-Gi-Oh geek) wasn't particularly appealing.
2006-10-17 21:14:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i dont know both sound good to me i guess it would have to go on personality i mean 5'6" is not that short i mean my ex was only 5'4" i mean dude was shorter than me and the man that i am currently seeing is 6'8" and like 240 and he is hot as hell to me i mean he looks good and his personality is great but i think that i would rather date taller men i dont know it is like an overbearing source of comfort i mean true i feel that i am standing next to a giant sometimes but it is a very comforting sense
2006-10-17 19:28:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by psycholilblondegirl 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm a guy, too and I just want to point-out to any guy out there who is troubled by his looks - consider the very successfull actor who is not only fat but short and bald to boot. Know who I refer-to?
2006-10-17 19:30:20
·
answer #11
·
answered by Beejee 6
·
0⤊
0⤋