How could Mr. Bush let more than 3000 americans die in Iraq?

Answer 1

To I hate liberals: How can you say "3000 is a small price to pay for liberating a country..." I bet nobody in your family was one of those 3000 people. Think about it. All the pain and sufferment that the relatives and friends of those people are going through and the families of the people who are there right know. I can´t believe you can say that about the people who are fighting for your country.

Answer 2

This is the stupidest question I have heard from a liberal in a long time. The fact of the matter is that we are at war, a global war on terror. And unfortunately, death's will happen. But blaming President Bush, who is a Patriot and one of our greatest Presidents of all time. For all the Islamic Fascists/Terrorists in the world is illogical, and dumb. President Bush did not ask for this war, but it was forced upon Him. And he has handled it with elegance and grace. Attacking/undermining President Bush, and distracting from the real issue: Islamic Fascists, does nothing but harm us, and give propaganda for the terrorists to use.

Furthermore, the only reason the Iraq war is still a war. Is because Bin Ladin and his like are cowards. Who think that it is more suitable for them to be hiding in caves, and strapping bombs onto their children to ambush our Military, so they will be sure to get their full 72 virgins' in heaven.. They do not wear uniforms, they will not meet us in battle, they run and hide in caves... If you do not call that a coward you are a fool.

And as chapelite said: "The casualty rate is the lowest in the history of armed conflict for the United States in every war except one. The first Gulf War." Is it just me, or would that imply a absolutely effective, and well executed plan?

Answer 3

in case you look at those concerns, you will come to the tip that the strategies-set of america is achievable to international peace. because of the fact what u.s. is announcing is that in case you're afraid of a veto in the protection Council, you could pass outdoors and take action and violate the sovereignty of alternative international places. that's the message they are sending to the international. That could desire to be condemned in the main effective words." - Nelson Mandela September 10, 2002 i do no longer trust the persons who say that till he's out of the workplace. regardless of if bush is going some one else will come and take his place. like we've seen in the previous years. could be American government ( maximum human beings are against conflict) will stop whilst China enhance to alter into the worlds next great power.

Answer 4

The casualty rate is the lowest in the history of armed conflict for the United States in every war except one. The first Gulf War.

Read the articles yourself.

Answer 5

Far more Americans have died in automobile accidents. Bush's fault, too? I think if you check carefully, you will find that Bubba Clinton had opportunity to face the Fascist Islamics, too, but he didn't have the Nads. Afraid he might insult someone, I guess, or he was too busy turning our Whitehouse into a bordello.

Answer 6

How can Clinton allow more than 3000 people to die in New York because he did nothing to prevent it??

Answer 7

3000 is a small price to pay for liberating a country and giving stability to future generations of both Iraqis and Americans

Answer 8

what do you expect from this question? you obviously dont expect a serious thought, so you must be simply trying to drum up angry people.

By the way, how could truman let so many die in japan?

How could Ike (as commander) allow so many losses at D-Day

Answer 9

its a war what the hell do you think is going to happen and its not even very many for liberating a country

Answer 10

Sorry, only Dems run away with their tail between their legs.