In the philosophy of religion, Occam's razor is sometimes applied to the existence of God; if the concept of God does not help to explain the universe, it is argued, God is irrelevant and should be cut away. While Occam's razor cannot prove God's nonexistence, it does imply that, in the absence of compelling reasons to believe in God, unbelief should be preferred.
2006-10-17 04:17:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Occam's razor is a logic device used to choose a cause for some observed phenomenon when more than a single cause is available, with the simplest choice being considered to be correct.
An example: A person sees a white light moving across the sky. Possible causes:
1. An airplane arriving at or departing from a nearby airport.
2. Space aliens in their interstellar craft.
Occam's Razor would dictate that choice 1 is correct.
However, should the observed white light be space aliens, then ...
As you can see, like most 'logical' arguments, facts sometimes can get in the way of pet agendas. Keep an open mind when using this tool (either one, your brain or Occam's Razor) and it will serve you well.
2006-10-17 04:22:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by credo quia est absurdum 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Occam's razor is a good judgment device used to decide for a reason for some suggested phenomenon whilst greater suitable than a unmarried reason is accessible, with the least confusing determination being seen to be appropriate. An occasion: someone sees a white easy moving around the sky. available motives: a million. An airplane arriving at or departing from a close-by airport. 2. area extraterrestrial beings of their interstellar craft. Occam's Razor could dictate that determination a million is authentic. even with the undeniable fact that, could the suggested white easy be area extraterrestrial beings, then ... As you will discover, like maximum 'logical' arguments, information each and every now and then can get interior the way of puppy agendas. shop an open thoughts whilst utilising this device (the two one, your thoughts or Occam's Razor) and it will serve you properly.
2016-10-02 09:32:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Basically most of the time the most simple explanation is the right one. There is no use in making things more complicated than they have to be.
Occam's razor states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating, or "shaving off," those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory. In short, when given two equally valid explanations for a phenomenon, one should embrace the less complicated formulation.
2006-10-17 04:19:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
All things being equal, the simplest explanation for ALL the facts tends to be the right one.
It's used a lot to try to imply God's non-existence but that's only when you throw away a lot of the facts.
In reality Occam's razor implies God's existence. He's the only explanation that supports all the facts.
2006-10-17 04:22:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
If you are trying to explain something but you can not prove any choice is the correct choice, you have to pick the simplest of choices.
Example:
An event (Z) occurs.
There are three possible reasons why the event occurred. (A)(Bb)(Cc).
You can not prove that either A,Bb, or Cc was the reason.
Occam's razor says you should explain why Z happened by chosing A.
2006-10-17 04:21:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ocum's Razor says that the simplest explanation is the best explanation.
corollary: Complexity breeds misunderstanding.
2006-10-17 04:21:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jay Z 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The simplest solution to a given problem that fits ALL the facts is most likely the correct one.
2006-10-17 04:17:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Abdijah 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
From Wikipedia:
"Occam's razor states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating, or "shaving off," those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory. In short, when given two equally valid explanations for a phenomenon, one should embrace the less complicated formulation."
Peace.
p.s. -- I just realized Occum's Razor supports Creationism and would reject evolution. Hmmmmmmm...
2006-10-17 04:18:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Suzanne: YPA 7
·
3⤊
5⤋
Simply put, it states that, when given a variety of answers to a problem, the most simple answer is usually the correct one.
2006-10-17 04:20:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Spirit Walker 5
·
2⤊
0⤋