Muslims have never seriously condemned any attack...rather they try to counter-blame or quote Quran to support them
It will certainly remove lot of blame from Islam if muslims, at least in YA, together condemn all terrorists...without exception
But will it happen ever ??
2006-10-17 04:37:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by ۞Aum۞ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
They are all guilty by association if they are not outraged by these acts, and speaking against it. What are people supposed to beleive about Islam if they have never been out of their country, and all they see is suicide bombers and terrorists on CNN blowing $hit up every day in the mane of "allah"?? I think given a choice, western Muslims would quickly take the side of their terroist brethren if another cartoon is made about Mohammad, and the foolishness reaches a fever pitch, and some mullah gets offended enough. They are doing it already in France and England. Why people think these are our misunderstood friends is beyond me.
2006-10-17 03:20:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Goddess of Nuts PBUH 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
The violence dedicated in the call of Allah is by technique of a tiny majority of the Muslim community, there is no want for each day Arabs to take duty for it, because they weren't even circuitously to blame for it. Sharing a faith with someone does no longer advise you ought to take duty for the violence that they take it upon themselves to commit in the call of your God. an basic mistake to make is to conceptualise the Muslim community as a novel monolithic entity, and it is in basic terms no longer the case. Muslims in Iraq and Muslims in Indonesia don't have a lot in easy, and radical Islamists do not characterize them. i imagine the biggest element to comprehend right here's that there is a distinction between an Islamic and an Islamist. An Islamic guy follows a faith. An Islamist envisions the forcible conversion of persons to Islam.
2016-12-04 22:17:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by hausladen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Muslims always condemn attacked 'in the name of Allah'. Most muslims are peaceful and don't think it is right to commit actions such as these. On the other hand Bush told the world that God spoke to him and that's why he invaded Iraq.
What does that tell you?
2006-10-17 03:19:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by curiosity 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
We do. Daily. Usually more than once a day.
Are you even aware of the US Code definition of Terrorism?
The Intelligence Community is guided by the definition of terrorism contained in Title 22 of the US Code, Section 2656f(d):
- The term "terrorism" means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience.
- The term "international terrorism" means terrorism involving the territory or the citizens of more than one country.
- The term "terrorist group" means any group that practices, or has significant subgroups that practice, international terrorism.
The government of Israel is a terrorist group, according to the US Code, for attacking the population of Lebanon. When will the media cover Jews standing against terrorism by fellow Jews?
Note that attacks against military personnel are excluded from the defintion of terrorism. I think Georgie and his friends at CNN and Fox News are unaware of this definition, though.
2006-10-17 03:17:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Smiley 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
i do believe there are Muslims that condemn the attacks, and the oraganizations are going off of a corrupted book of the Koran
2006-10-17 03:15:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by danicolegirl 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
First Chirstians should stop killing. Stop invading the weak.
Leave Iraq.
2006-10-17 03:15:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by aa_mohammad 4
·
1⤊
2⤋