I agree because if you are going to the UK, you need to the follow the rules and that is just like in any other country.
2006-10-16 13:40:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
First off the UK is not Christian, it's quite muti cultural and just because someone is registered in the Church of England does not make them believer, many people I've questioned don't even know the reason behind Lent, especially younger children who think Christmas is all about a tree and some presents from Sauta Claus.
In regards to the other matter, have you ever been down to a welfare office, do you know who scronges from the government?From this pathetic question I'd say you haven't. It's mainly white British born people who know which extra benefits they can be entitled to considering that the actual support given is quite minor but most people from other countries aren't aware of this and attempt to make ends meet.
Those who are refugees or seeking asylum in this country they had to escape their own countries in fear for their own lives, and many others especially recently are here because they have more technical skills then the British people, and they have to pay their own way not getting any subsidaries from the government.
And then you question freedom of speech? don't make me laugh, are nudists allowed to walk around naked? no so not complete freedom right? and then there's the fact that people going on these protests are mainly people who have daytime jobs and are using their own freedom of speech as you would say.
What you need to learn before you make the hole that you've dug even wider is that there is a difference between freedom and respect, should I declare that all Christians are stupid for worshipping a statue of a man in a nappy? No that's complete lack of respect for someone following their own beliefs.
BTW the whole nappy thing is not my idea I've just heard some bible bashers saying it once, so no offense to any Christians out there, I have nothing against the Christian faith.
2006-10-17 00:44:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by hints_dont_work 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
McCain helping newspapers -- so, you're admitting they are no longer truly information papers, yet prapaganda machines, dedicated to smearing Obama with lies. you have have been given issues backwards. Obama does have faith in loose speech, loose press, and governmental transparancy. The RNC and Bush administration have performed each and every thing they might to stifle loose speech for every person who disagrees with them. From arresting non violent protesters, to calling truthfully everyone who disagrees with Bush a terrorist, to hiding from public view virtually each and every thing the administration does and why they have performed it. Uh, those papers are no longer the three best newspapers interior the U. S.. they're additionally between the least respected, as being often sleezy rags, particularly than supplies of surely information.
2016-12-26 21:11:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't know much about them(UK), but I am Learning.
The Plastic Zippers on some of there Coats arn't to Zippy either.
Coats pretty good though.
2006-10-16 13:41:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by maguyver727 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is not free speech on all matters in the UK
Could one of the newspapers have a front cover of the pope raping a boy (cartoon)...dont think that would be published somehow
free speech when it suits
2006-10-16 13:38:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by abdulaziiz 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Those that refuse to give up their backward tribal ways should not be here. If they don't understand or refuse to understand and accept democracy, show them the door and charge them for the trouble. Let them rant and rave in the sewerage-swilled, tribal territories, they and theirs came from. Let's have a National Referendum and show them what democracy really is.
2006-10-16 14:41:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Freedom of speech includes the right to disagree with having free speech.
2006-10-16 13:46:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mac Momma 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Well, I think that Saudi Arabia wouldn't have a problem kicking out Brits who don't follow the rules...why can't it work the otehr way around? Is there a double standard?
2006-10-16 13:41:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
YES!
We don't want them here.
Why are they here, to scrounge off the rest of us.
Throw them all out - send them home.
Replace them with immigrants from the nbew EU countries.
2006-10-17 07:35:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
then I eat Latin American and English you as is your country and your laws and I believe that the immigrants who do not respten the laws of your country you have the right to deport them well but as in Latin America racism does not exist here and all we are equal the immigrants are received in respect form and human quality as straight of human seras but all we did not think equal back in Europe I believe that it is as well as your you say
2006-10-16 13:45:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Rafa Méx D.F 4
·
0⤊
0⤋