No of course not, liking sum1 has to do with all the good and the bad. when u like sum1 for themselves u r a very sincere person and have good intentions at heart. besides physical appearance has to do with liking sum1 as well. ur not going to like sum1 that doesnt take care of herself/himself. so dont worry about that, ur not shallow. TRUST ME.
2006-10-16 12:08:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by EmySaur :D 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're not shallow unless your standards are really ridiculous. Like Jason Alexander complaining about a hot girl's toes in Shallow Hal.
2006-10-16 12:10:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
You have to be attracted to someone this can be for a number of reasons. If the fact that a person doesn't meet you ideal looks for a woman is the only reason that you choose not to date them or be friends with them than yes you are shallow.
2006-10-16 12:10:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Suesan W 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, not really because everyone still have their preferences. That's one thing that will likely attract you to a person as much as other factors such as personality, intelligence, etc. I think PA is what everyone looks at when deciding if they want to date someone or not. I just think it's a difference when you are just highly attracted to someone than being really arrogant and narcissistic. Sometimes being too judgemental can mess up something good, so I think that just liking someone for their looks can have some advantages, but also it's disadvantages as well.
2006-10-16 12:10:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by pumpk713 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not shallow to have standards, but they should be legitimate standards. Standards like, "needs to be motivated" or "is very active" are ok, and can be your own personal standards.
But if your standards are things like: "needs to be thin" or "has to be hot" then yes, you are getting to a shallow point and are only evaluating someone by physical looks, and not by their personality.
2006-10-16 12:13:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by *Logan's Mommy* 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Aggression is extraordinarily basic, IMO - a planned attempt to harm or kill. enjoying doggies do no longer fall into that class. :o) A canines that's aggressive devoid of provocation or that's unpredictable is a candidate for euthanasia. How long it would take to decide no be counted if the canines became trainable or might desire to be placed down might probable count on the canines and the guy. I had an aggressive foster canines, and it took me a pair of weeks to decide no be counted if he became going to be trainable or no longer. considering he became purely aggressive specially circumstances, i became waiting to paintings with him and recondition him in those circumstances, and he continues to be around. His adopters have had him a one year and so a procedures each and every thing is high-quality. i would not propose, only from analyzing a query, that a canines be placed down. Who knows if the asker is even analyzing the habit appropriately? I even have no longer in any respect attempted yelping, and that i'm no longer stupid sufficient to place my face close to an aggressive canines so i'm able to chew it on the ear. (yet i'm prepared to video exhibit Beth attempt. :o))
2016-12-16 08:47:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by nichelle 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Looks eventually play a factor? Don't you mean looks first and themselves second? How can you like someone first but then decide you don't because of how they look? I think you have it backwards, either that or you like someone and you're too embarrassed to like them, so you don't want to be seen with them.
2006-10-16 12:10:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Caitlin 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Men are attracted to looks full stop . Dont let your standerds drop man just go for who you are attracted to . Im a shallow prick but who cares i jnust want hot woman for me lol . I say your smart not shallow .
2006-10-16 12:07:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by badass-mofu 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes it's shallow.
2006-10-23 04:21:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hell NO!
It's called "Losers need not apply!"
2006-10-16 12:07:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋