English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Neocons and compassionate conseervatives border the lines of socialism along with liberal democrats. Would you support a movement of traditional conservatism? Please remember that traditional conservatism is not the extreme right wingers. The only thing it has to do with religeon is cutting off funding for church fundraisers. Traditional conservatism supports true capitalism and puts faith in the citizens of the country to donate their personal wealth to help the poor and needy. Taxes should not be forcible taken from us.

2006-10-16 11:50:30 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Civic Participation

12 answers

About this new conservative party......should be along the lines of Reagan's politics instead of neocons like Bush? If that's true, then I'm all for it.

2006-10-16 11:53:11 · answer #1 · answered by chrstnwrtr 7 · 2 0

Good idea. Do you have the funds, and ability to organize the core to begin building the machine that will attract qualified candidates? You will need to get newspapers, and media on your side, and spend at least 10 years in nothing more then an educational campaign. You will need to attract some serious contributors who will put up their own resources. All in all, however, I can see how it would be good for the nation. You won't get rid of the parties that exist, you will simply replace one or the other over time.

2006-10-16 12:54:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

it's all for the common good, that is the new DNC rallying cry, can you get any closer to communism then "all for the common good". 40 plus % of our country will go along with this, how could you pull a majority out of this country of true conservatives when so many want what they won't work for and the Dem's are promising to give it to them "all for the common good" The communists party in America has consistently supported Dem candidates,hmmmm.

2006-10-16 12:02:55 · answer #3 · answered by razeumright 3 · 0 0

No taxes must remain mandatory. There would be very few people 'donate' regularly to the government. And like now where many people are currently unhappy with this administration, how many would bother to donate?

2006-10-16 11:53:20 · answer #4 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 1 1

traditional conservatism it is the key to solve all problems in the world, and all of us, must support a.s.a.p. in all world the traditional conservatism !!
all other politics are destroying our world and transforming us into slaves of tax+imorality +hipocrisy slavery, etc.
LETS CHANGE THE WORLD

2006-10-16 12:36:24 · answer #5 · answered by J. C 1 · 0 0

It will never happen Why/ Because the citizens don't run the country, and neither do the politicians. The people that own it do. They have there plan, and "NICE" isn't a part of it anywhere.

2006-10-16 11:58:56 · answer #6 · answered by flip4449 5 · 0 1

Taxes were originally collected in the U.S. in a similar style but on average they only got about 1/4 of their goal...

2006-10-16 11:59:10 · answer #7 · answered by smacked 2 · 0 1

Shades of 1933 !

2006-10-16 12:00:57 · answer #8 · answered by kman1830 5 · 0 1

the BBC do promote now - plugs on communicate shows, product placements ... maybe they could desire to easily start up charging for it! i've got no longer had a television considering that december 1999 for precisely this reason - i do no longer strategies paying the BBC to observe BBC programmes, yet I merchandise to paying them for permission to observe the different area. Do I could desire to pay Tesco for permission to shop at Asda? Do I could desire to pay London Underground for permission to get on a bus? in the previous days, the BBC replaced into the only game on the city, so as that they could fee [like the previous radio licence]. yet now they are minor gamers in an ever-extra desirable pool, and the licence value could desire to be abolished - because of the fact the radio licence value replaced into. yet they could desire to nevertheless be publicly funded to circumvent advertiser bias! what the BBC do properly, they do fantastically - think of of the David Attenborough sequence, for one. I had an thought that they could scramble their indicators and additionally you had to purchase a decoder to be waiting to observe. that throughout all probability does no longer usher in sufficient gross sales [everyobody could in basic terms could desire to make a single purchase], so upload a value card, with £x for y hours' viewing, that could desire to be crowned up at shops like different provider enjoying cards. so which you may in basic terms pay the BBC for gazing BBC - all different channels could desire to be watched with out value. that way, no possible desire to doge the licence, so as that they could scrap the detector trucks and the threatening letters. human beings could in basic terms pay for the quantity of BBC television that they actually watch. particular arrangements could desire to be made for hospitals and care residences and so on and the BBC could desire to scrap the licencing centre and use the gross sales toactually *make programmes*!!! *s* i've got been thinking approximately posting this on the Downing highway Petitions internet site, what d'you reckon?

2016-10-19 12:35:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

God wouldn't that be a breath of fresh air.

2006-10-16 12:44:02 · answer #10 · answered by Ranger473 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers