No evidence to date has been discovered. Bush himself has admitted that there weren't any (see Bob Woodward's book).
2006-10-16 10:16:00 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No evidence to date has been discovered. Bush himself has admitted that there weren't any.
2006-10-16 13:26:17 · update #1
We've found numerous stockpiles of out of date shells, we've found small stashes of current shells, and we know the rest went to Syria...
Oh yeah, Bob Woodward a writer... who NEVER writes with the express purpose of earning money from his liberal readers.
Woodward who loves to quote others 3rd or 4th hand... in a court, that is called "HEARSAY".
Yes, sadly we had intel sources in Iraq who fed us false info... the CIA didn't catch it, yet noted that similar info was held by France, Germany, Great Britain, and the Israelis.
2006-10-16 13:15:49 · answer #1 · answered by mariner31 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
See an article dated FEB 27 2006 in Investors Business Daily. There were WMD. Saddam made tapes that aired publicly. There are hundreds of hours of tape that are still being translated but the first 12 hours are damning to say the least. Bush did not lie about the WMD. Saddam talks openly of chemical and yes, nuclear weapons programs. I would be happy to e-mail you a copy of the article I saved as a PDF attachment if you want to e-mail me at zuiax@yahoo.com or look up the article http://www.investors.com/ibdarchives/titled "Saddam had WMD" investors business daily 2-27-06. The media has egg on it's face so you won't hear about this on CNN, CBS,NBC or ABC. Wall street journal also had an article about this around the same time.
2006-10-16 17:33:43 · answer #2 · answered by zuiax 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Didn't you hear? They found some stockpiles of chemical artillery shells!
Never mind that they are 15 years old.
And the chemical agent had deteriorated to the point that they were less deadly than a can of Raid.
And there were only 500 of them spread out all over Iraq.
But they were definitely WMD...ish. Sort of. In a way.
2006-10-16 17:28:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
the same way that there is no evidence that there isn't. Sadam had complete MIG18 buried in the sand. it took forever to get inspectors in there. no one can say they are not buried somewhere either. if you had 100lbs of cocanie and the police said that in 2 weeks on this date exactly we are coming to your house to look for it, are you going to still have it there? no, you get rid of it, or hide it. there are possibilities to it all. maybe he did, maybe he didn't but you can't say he didn't without the possiblity he did.
2006-10-16 23:32:23 · answer #4 · answered by Steve B 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe because we did. Of course before the invasion I am sure those 500 trucks racing to syria were all just fullof money or empty, yeah right.
2006-10-16 17:22:30 · answer #5 · answered by Have gun, will travel. 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's not about WMD's. It's about THIS!...
http://www.strayreality.com/Lanis_Strayreality/iraq.htm
2006-10-17 12:14:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because there wasn't any in the first place. You don't have to question us on that, we know bush admitted it already.
2006-10-16 20:38:36 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
they know none was found in Iraq . but will never admit to it . die hart neo cons
2006-10-16 17:21:23 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Probably because we sold them to someone at some point. . .
2006-10-16 19:11:47 · answer #9 · answered by Mee 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well, if they're stupid enough to let him stay in office..
2006-10-16 17:18:21 · answer #10 · answered by shmux 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋