As a parent or teacher would you object to cameras in the classroom in light of the school violence?

Answer 1

no...sounds like a great idea

Answer 2

So far, I haven't seen any school shooting cases where the assailants weren't caught and/or killed. My impression is that these school shooters are psychos who want to be seen, who want to be caught on camera. Consequently, I don't think having more cameras around a school would be a significant deterrent.

Moreover, I would be concerned about abuse of those cameras should they be put in the classroom. Cameras in hallways & near entrances to prevent truancy or deter other kinds of criminals (i.e. burlgars, child molesters, etc.) from entering/leaving the property is one thing. But what happens when teachers are spied upon during regular classroom sessions? Wouldn't that send a big chill through the academic atmosphere, limiting the free expression of thoughts and ideas (by both teachers and students) that is so vital to a quality education? I'm not saying that such abuse of a security camera system would happen, but potential for such abuse of a security system is cause for concern.

Answer 3

Being as a public school classroom is a public space in a public building, no one has the right to expect privacy there. It's not like they want cameras in the bathrooms. The records of the scores accrued by students within this public space are also matters of public record, as is the curriculum. One would think therefore that occurances within the classroom should also be a recordable matter of public record.
The right to privacy objections now having been addressed, as a parent of two children, I am all for such measures, not only as a deterrent and as an active enforcement tool, but also as a method of resolving the question of "who started it", and "who did what", when mischief occurs within the classroom. This system also allows administrators the oppertunity to observe teachers for signs of innapropriate behavior, and allows administrators oppertunities to judge effectiveness of student-teacher interactions.
I'm all for it. I think it should be manditory.

Answer 4

As a parent I think I'd be okay with cameras in the classroom.
However, do you really think they would be effective in preventing school violence? I think cameras would only serve as an eyewitness to violence.
Maybe we should spend more to invest in families and teaching kids that violence in never the answer to their hurts and problems.
We want to blame the public school system for all that has happened, but really the problems start in the home!

Answer 5

There are cameras all over my office and the downtown area. Why should schools be exempt? They are government operated public buildings. Our school does have cameras in the classrooms so the principal can monitor teaching or behavioral problems as needed. Most day cares now have cameras where parents can monitor their kids via the Internet.

Answer 6

Do you really think cameras in the classroom would reduce school violence?

Most of the people who have committed violent acts in schools have done it in broad daylight, with plenty of witnesses. They've been caught, or have committed suicide afterward. Cameras wouldn't have deterred them.

One might argue that cameras in classrooms could increase school violence. People who are prone to doing this sort of thing might like the idea that everyone would be able to see exactly what happened.

Answer 7

As a parent I am all for the cameras in the schools

Answer 8

i don't think of our college equipment is doing in basic terms positive, yet i think of you may properly be taking Obama's quote somewhat incorrect. mothers and dads may be prosperous or unfavorable, engaged or disengaged, healthful or risky. mothers and dads are in certainty instructors, for stable or ill. Having prosperous mothers and dads, whether, would not assure that a individual could have the potential to think of and to make stable judgements. Neither does having unfavorable mothers and dads (or abusive ones) avert eventual fulfillment. i think of he became attempting to declare that the properly suited instructor could make a real distinction in a toddler's existence. maximum mothers and dads at the instant are unable or inspired to coach their very own babies to truly think of for themselves--there is too lots of an emotional attachment, for one element, and that's confusing to stay dispassionate. the properly suited instructor can help do this devoid of impacting the parent's authority in the homestead. that's not that instructors are extra significant than mothers and dads--they only have a diverse interest description. the mothers and dads interest is strictly what you pronounced--to furnish a loving, good homestead environment and to dress, feed, and otherwise take care of their young ones. instructors, on the different hand, can in basic terms be people properly-versed in historic previous or language or math who prefer to assist babies replace into proficient in those areas, besides. We actual prefer the two stable instructors and stable mothers and dads precise now. (As a final observe; it extremely is an exceedingly stable element that my spouse isn't my young ones' math instructor...) peace.

Answer 9

I don't think they should be allowed ina normal classroom, but if you are talking about some sort of photo taking class the n definitely.

Answer 10

no, that would not bother me at all. in fact i would like it so that you can see what is going on. like have a password that was given out to parents at the beginning of the year. i wouldn't mind knowing what was going on during the day with my daughter, and to see how the teacher was doing her job.

Answer 11

I would object if it precluded spending money on things like better text books and better teachers.