The only proof atheists have that god is not real is evolution which is sad because their only "proof" is nothing but a lie and a crazy belief. Even Darwin didn't believe evolution could be possible...
2006-10-16 08:14:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
10⤋
that's enormously glaring you do not prefer solutions to those questions, yet i'm going to respond to you besides. a million) How does some thing come from not something? -- this has not something to do with evolution. Cosmology, according to probability, yet it extremely is a diverse subject rely. 2) Which stepped forward first: the digestive equipment, the food to be digested, the urge for food, the potential to discover and eat the food, the digestive juices, or the physique's resistance to that's very own digestive juice? The food in this sort of organic and organic molecules in the primordial soup have been cutting-edge first, and then the digestive equipment stepped forward to technique the food extra effectively. The others stepped forward with time. 3) Which stepped forward first the force to reproduce or the potential to reproduce? They stepped forward jointly. 4) Which got here first male or woman? They stepped forward jointly. 5) Which got here first the bones, ligaments, tendons, blood grant, or muscle tissues to go the bones? The muscle tissues got here first, as shown by using invertebrates that have muscle tissues yet no bones (or maybe shells.) by using ways, this final shows your extreme lack of understanding of even common biology. ok, now bypass forward an declare victory. Zvi the Fiddler
2016-10-16 06:36:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hi. First, I just want to be up front and say that I respect everyone's right to their own opinion. That is one of the fantastic things about living in this country! Secondly, it's good that you are seeking out information about this topic. I believe the best way to learn about something is to gather as much information on the topic as you can. I would recommend reading about BOTH sides of the "arguement", because you will either a) learn about the opposition's point of view, and be able to better "refute" their position in an arguement, or b) decide you find something about what they are saying interesting, and be able to pursue it further. Having said all that, I would ask that you clarify what exactly you are labeling "evolution". I found these questions on the website you listed. They are "addressed" to evolutionists.
1. Where did the space for the universe come from?
2. Where did matter come from?
3. Where did the laws of the universe come from (gravity, inertia, etc.)?
4. How did matter get so perfectly organized?
5. Where did the energy come from to do all the organizing?
6. When, where, why, and how did life come from dead matter?
7. When, where, why, and how did life learn to reproduce itself?
8. With what did the first cell capable of sexual reproduction reproduce?
The theory of "evolution" does not even PRETEND to answer these questions. The first 5 are very firmly in the realm of what physicists and astronomers study. They have nothing at all to do with species evolving from one another. The last three are ALSO not what the theory of evolution claims to answer. Evolution is simply a theory that proposes how different creatures "got started" if life started somewhere on its own, in a very simple form. Evolution makes NO claims on "how the universe began" or "how matter forms creatures". Evolution does NOT exclude the existence of a "supreme being". It's ok to believe what you want; you have every right! However, your arguements/statements will be more convincing if you are talking about what you know, instead of reciting what you have been told. Get out there and LEARN about what you believe. Otherwise, you are just a holy fool.
2006-10-16 08:25:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by stillstanding 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
I agree with you. Mutation is proven, but it is not the same thing as evolution. No one has any real evidence of mutation from one species to another. If there were a missing link, it would have been found by now. And nobody ever found any ape-men in the jungles.
2006-10-16 08:22:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Brigid O' Somebody 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
hopefully soon, cuz time is running out to follow God. I really like that site. The thing that gets on my nerves is that they will first talk about microevolution then when the cracks of their theory start to show, they tunr the conversation or their argument to macroevolution which are TWO different things. They know they are wrong and that this stupid theory can't help its self so they try to find ways to make their story seem right. They just want to not be on God's side and believe that He is REAL and that He is Lord and Savior and King, and Loving Father.
2006-10-16 08:20:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mia 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
Could you provide a neutral website to prove your "hoax" theory? And you don't have to capitalize science...why did you do that? What's wrong with you people anyway? Why don't you just believe what you do and let others believe what they do? Why are you so eager to disprove something that has no bearing on your life? Just get on with living and stop worrying about whether evolution is correct or not...what difference does it make to you? And I could also ask you "when will believers realize that religion is a hoax?" But I wouldn't.....
2006-10-16 09:05:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Let's say it is, and that they do. Jesus will still be some cult leader carpenter who's been dead for thousands of years. Science probably still won't support what you believe in, so why not take your quest to the next level and try to rid the world of science? After all, man needs not intelligent thought, because our whole purpose in life is to praise Jesus, right? Unless we are all willing to throw our own children into a volcano for Jesus then we just aren't right in the eyes of the LORD!
2006-10-16 08:56:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mr. Bojangles 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
When will Christians realize that Jesus was just a dead carpenter... Science supports Evolution pretty nicely: in fact, there is EVIDENCE for Evolution. Religion, on the other hand, is the concept not supported by anything.
2006-10-16 08:15:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Blackacre 7
·
5⤊
3⤋
You have to be kidding me. Should I listen to "Jesus-is-savior.com" or all the scientists in the world? Only 0.14% of scientists in the related field don't believe in evolution. They are much smarter then an obviously bias web site.
2006-10-16 10:05:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Take it from Toby 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
The first thing I saw on that site- "evolution is stupid". Very scientific. I go to a site about evolution and it NEVER says creationism is stupid-it says it is wrong and sets out the reasons why it is wrong. If 99% of biologists are wrong are they deluded, mentally challenged or biased? It is too incredible to be taken seriously-99% of scientists who have spent their life studying evidence are wrong? It's crazy but that is exactly what creationists are saying.
P.S. re. above comment- No it's because real scientists don't resort to silly abuse-they use scientific methodology to undermine the arguments of others. 99% of professional biologists are wrong? Awaiting your response.
2006-10-16 08:20:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
How can evolution be a hoax? how else dou explain the development of DDT resistant mosquitoes, or fossils?
Man why can't you be like me, I firmly believe in God I am studying to be a doctor, and no theory, no scientific finding can ever take me away from my God, I think your faith in God is not strong enough. Can u possibly think that evloution took place w/o God's supervision?
2006-10-16 08:16:30
·
answer #11
·
answered by virgodoll 4
·
3⤊
3⤋