As far as the people working in the World Trade, I don't think anyone in the inside had any thing to do with the planes crashing in to the two towers. I believe the government had something to do with it and they want to blame it on Bin.
2006-10-16 08:29:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sugar J 1
·
2⤊
2⤋
Whether it was an inside job or not it is a wake up call for all Americans to take back the power that they have so eagerly relinquished to our government and have them be more accountable for their actions,America throws too much money at it,s problems and hope that it will buy and solve our problems.We as a nation have to wake up to what is really going on in this country and take back it,s power.The spirit of the constitution is to have our elected delegates answerable to the nation,people in countries with lesser freedoms have more public outcry than this nation of weaklings and self serving,party animals.we the public are led around by our noses like cows to the slaughter ,just to preserve our false sense of freedom and leaving the real fighting to the military,do not blame the government because "we the people" are to blame,since we have forgotten our history and have not shown what our founding fathers have so enviously built,wake up America.
2006-10-16 16:04:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by delmy d 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I love this question because a positive answer assumes that our government is (a) Competent enough to orchestrate such a complex attack, (b) Able to keep it quiet during the planning phase, and (c) Able to keep it a secret during what would have been the necessary cover-up.
Also, a note to all of you Big Oil conspiracy theorists: If oil were really the sole motivating factor for going to war, why would we be screwing around with the Middle East? Why wouldn't we find some sort of excuse to invade Mexico and Venezuela instead? Makes a lot more sense if all you're going for is extra oil reserves.
My advice to you is to lay off the drugs.
2006-10-16 23:00:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chris D 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, it was an inside job.
The muslim hijackers got inside the United States, then they got inside some airplanes, then they got inside the cockpits, and flew them inside some buildings, and the fuel inside the airplanes burned inside the buildings.
You're a moron if you think that an attack that appears to have been carried out by the same people that took responsibility for it, who are the same ones that have been carrying out similar attacks for decades was more likely to have been carried out by the very people who appear to be trying their best to defend this country against said attackers.
Your lack of evidence is equalled only by your lack of intelligence. The latter precludes you from seeing the former.
2006-10-16 17:07:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by open4one 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There really should be a limit on the number of times the same question can be asked. The answer remains the same - NO. Unless by inside job you mean Al-Queda.
2006-10-16 16:15:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by JB 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
there are better places to look for information than yahoo answers. there are tons of websites arguing both sides of the event. many documentaries have been made as well "loosechange" and "terrorstorm" are some free ones that are somewhat enlightening. tricky question that i wish could be resolved so people would stop asking it, but then again... if people stop asking then people will forget.
2006-10-16 17:06:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by da_d0dgers 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Although people who cite "common sense" as a reason to say no! I have yet to meet someone intelligent who has looked, for themselves, at the evidence available and come to any other conclusion that it was, it's just the details that are hazy.
2006-10-18 19:24:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by hog b 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe it was
so bush could go after the arab countries for oil or money...
look at history
his father was after the arabs and now he is... if his brother ever gets elcted..he will be also..
911 happpened by the american govt..and it was an passage in to these countries for them.
2006-10-16 15:39:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Arsh S 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think bush knew about it the whole time and used it an excuse to finish what his father started.
2006-10-17 16:36:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by lexi w 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that we have seen this question ad nauseum. STOP IT.
2006-10-16 15:37:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Answergirl 5
·
1⤊
0⤋