NO!!! I think that it is truly time to let dimplomacy run its course and maybe not have the USA serve as the referee. Its about time that some other nations that have depended on our military's help and aide take the lead on these two countries.
And yes, Lucky2 is just being an instigator. What a prick!!
2006-10-15 15:51:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Porterhouse 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm an European, your question has ended up on the Ireland UK thread. therefore that's why you are getting replies from over here. if you don't mind me answering. if the USA bomb any of these two countries, these countries would definitely gain sympathy from other neighbouring countries. which in turn would lead to an escalation of far more serious terrorist attacks on both USA and European home ground from new groups other than El Quaida. even GWB would have agree to this. other than Iran or North Korean starting a war i can't see this happening. I believe going by your other questions on Yahoo I think you could have similar views. If I'm right you definite seem to be an exception to most of your fellow Americans who rightly or wrongly seems to want bombing as the answer. I have to be honest I geniunely find that very unnerving, what do you think?
2006-10-16 16:16:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by sycamore 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO not till they do something to us or attempt. Then still no nukes need to be dropped. The USA can take the fight out of NK in maybe 24 to 48 hours if needed, And not use a single nuke.
But till they do something to the USA, why would the USA want to do a first strike being they can't harm the USA?
This is watch and see what NK does next game. At some point when they shoot a missile at Hawaii or Japan or the south then we will have the right to attack. I just hope our defense missile system works right.
2006-10-15 15:41:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Don K 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
i think of that's yet another ridiculous rumor that has no foundation in certainty. Israel in no way tells every physique which includes the U.S. before they take militia action. The U.S. has no interest in bombing North Korea. President pick Obama have been given elected claiming he became going to end conflict, which all of us comprehend is a marketing campaign lie, yet non the fewer he would not initiate his tenure by using bombing every physique.
2016-10-16 05:59:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by valda 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Samidoo,
I think that bombing either country will not solve all the problems, but it could slow those problem's down a lot. With the precision weaponry that we have, these smart bombs could be very successful. They could certainly take out the worst sites that we know of. Like I said bombing won't solve all the problems, but should help in controlling the situation.
TDCWH
2006-10-16 01:10:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by TDCWH 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
US should bomb North Korea first to teach Iran a lesson. The earlier has it already and Iran is just beginning to build it..
2006-10-15 15:29:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
War is not the answer and solves nothing.
When did we acquire North Korea?? Right - we have no authority to "teach them a lesson" nor to bully them around.
2006-10-15 15:35:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Nancy 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Negative, because there are thousands of innocent people around who will die and others will suffer. Go to the negotiating table and solve the crisis in a peaceful means.
2006-10-15 15:39:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by dodadz 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
One flaw in your theory.We should carpet bomb North Korea,to let 'em know that we ain't a puttin' up with that dog eating dictator no more.
2006-10-15 15:33:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by STIFLE IT LIBS 1 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ok lets get this so you can wrap your brain around it. NOBODY wants to start a nuclear war. Its like this say you are standing in a pool of gas with two people you dislike. would you throw a lit match in it ???
2006-10-15 15:30:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Biker 6
·
1⤊
0⤋