English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why should we teach more than one side of things? Why do people say 'teach both sides, and let the kids decide for themselves'?

Should we just teach kids that 1+1=2, or maybe 3 or 4, and let them figure it out for themselves? Maybe we should teach them the colors backwards and see how long it takes them to figure it out.

Should we really be crippling our children by telling them that maybe science doesn't actually work, maybe you shouldn't bother going to the doctor?

2006-10-15 14:45:34 · 9 answers · asked by eri 7 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

9 answers

We should teach more than one side of things so that people understand that there is often more than one point of view. Rigidly (or ignorantly) sticking to the belief that one point of view is the only correct point of view is, and has been, the root cause of a lot of the problems in this world.

That being said, I'm not advocating a policy where all points of view are weighted equally. That would be paralyzation through indecision. I think there is a good middle road where a certain set of views is taught as a foundation from which to start, and then perhaps even more importantly, a process of evaluating opinions/beliefs that conflict with that foundation is implemented.
Teaching math and colors would be part of the foundation, as would teaching how religion, politics, and science in general *operate*. Deciding what to believe for each of those subjects however, that would all be subject to the evaluation process.

This is part of the reason why science works so well - it has a built-in system for evaluating new information (hypotheses get tested and retested). Unfortunately its also the reason why politics and religion seem to have conflicts so often - believing that one way of life is the only correct way of life despite whatever new information/situation arises.

2006-10-17 15:15:32 · answer #1 · answered by Westward 2 · 0 0

you are trying to compare apples and coconuts here.

mathematics are a sound science and are not subject to change.
they have worked the same way for 100 years and will continue to work the same way for another 1000 years.

religion changes every day and has no solid proof.

evolution is taught as scientific theory and not as fact. theory is
a scientific method used to start a study into why something works.

the heart pumping blood through the body to carry oxygena nd nutrients was once a theory. it was proven by science and is now a fact.

evolution and creation cannot be proven. the origins of the planet will never be proven so i think that niether should be taught in school. but evolution could possibly be used as an example or a scientific theory. it is a good example because it will always be an example.

as a metter of fact how much time is actually spent on evolution as the source of mankind and the beginning of the planet in high schools not..i can only remember 1 or 2 classes about evolution in my school.

i think that some christians just cant stand anything that just might challenge their beliefs. and i think that this comes from a very simple lack of faith.

if you have a mustard seed of faith in god you cam move a mountain right?

so will a high school class destroy that faith completly. if you had it first i think that it would be a hard thing to destroy..

2006-10-15 15:06:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

we could desire to continually be coaching distinctive perspectives, do no longer you think of? "the two sides on a controversy" shows there exist in ordinary terms 2 possible positions on any situation while in fact there could be, and oftentimes are, many. i'm a instructor and a reporter, so I deal in relaying data as far as what particular human beings have pronounced and accomplished. on the slavery subject count number or the different, there are continually extra beneficial than 2 perspectives despite if or no longer they're insane or rational. this is all honest interest for talk and prognosis.

2016-12-08 15:28:27 · answer #3 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

I have no problem with teaching creationism in school as long as it is taught as a religious doctrine, not as a science. Keep it out of science classes, and take it to literature or religion class. There is no scientific evidence to call it science.

2006-10-15 14:54:22 · answer #4 · answered by roknrolr63 4 · 1 0

You're comparing apples and oranges. Mathematical sums will always be the same. I think there are just a couple of religions that don't allow people to go to the doctor. I don't agree with it, but it is the right of the parents to practice whatever religion they wish.
Just because it is a view I don't agree with, I have no right to forbid that view.

2006-10-15 14:49:59 · answer #5 · answered by Purdey EP 7 · 1 0

Because it's proven that 1+1=2, but things like God and religion are not proven, and evolution, technically is a theory (even though it's a pretty damn rational one, but that's just my opinion). Blessed be. :)

2006-10-15 14:50:04 · answer #6 · answered by Maria Isabel 5 · 1 0

If the church teaches creationism fine but schools need to teach facts not beliefs.

2006-10-15 14:50:13 · answer #7 · answered by tammidee10 6 · 1 0

I explained evolution and creationism to my youngest son. He decided that God created the universe and he used evolution to do it.

Made sense to me.

Love and blessings Don

2006-10-15 14:49:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Youre being logical, but religious people are too insane to be logical. They believe in their sky god and there is no reaching them.

2006-10-15 14:48:50 · answer #9 · answered by Phil S 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers