In a legal case what are log files from an ISP called? Forensic evidence or ?

Question

I'm referring to log files and stuff from internet service providers... Is forensic evidence the correct term, or how do you refer to log file evidence in a way that non-technical folks can understand what you're talking about? I've got some subpoena'd log files from an ISP proving something a police officer told my boss about my use of the internet is not true, but I don't know how to refer to it in the complaint so that a 60yr old police cheif will know I've got concrete evidence without confusing him with technical jargon...

Answer 1

I would call it "documentation," it may have to be notarized by the ISP to be official and admissible in court, stating from a manger that they indeed supplied this record. Forensic evidence is gathered by a professional crime scene analyst or detective familiar with the rules of evidence, correct proceedure (not contaminating), and chain of custody. The log files might better have been sent by the ISP directly to the Chief, as you having possession interupts chain of custody in a way. It is probably okay.
Include the ISPs phone number in case the Chief needs to contact them for explanation. Police are conversant with computers, they are integral to law enforcement, and most cruisers are online.
They run driver's license and background checks from the car.

Answer 2

it is very a bounce there dumbo..... the priority isn't with most of the techniques used via atheists to assist their closed minded, foregone conclusions. the priority is with the manipulation of fabric, the around good judgment, blind leaps of religion and the desperation atheists have in making particular that religions are ridiculed and destroyed.... solid success with that. the religion which you carry forth isn't something new. that's one thousand's of years previous and the comparable end may well be reached now as replaced into decrease back then: "The fool says in his coronary heart 'no God.'" satisfied you loved the nick-call....yet heavily, your proposition is previous rediculous. You presupose that till somebody is of an identical opinion inclusive of your viewpoint they could be blind to any logical physique of wisdom. Do you call that open minded? Are so closed minded which you won't be in a position to settle for that diverse conclusions may well be drawn from the comparable physique of suggestions? i do no longer think in evolution as a proof of the beginning of life on earth yet i'm able to comprehend why this may well be a end it is reached via the great majority of scientists. i'm able to flippantly hear to arguments for it and locate a lot of them very compelling. yet whilst i circulate to respond to those arguments and talk in regards to the failings that there are interior the assumption i'm met with verbal assaults, call calling and nonsensical ramblings which contain your question. So don't be so suprised which you get carry of derogatory comments approximately your intelligence once you do no longer hesitate to do the comparable on your question.

Answer 3

Evidence contradicting the police officers charges. The police chief didn't get to be a police chief by being stupid. If I were you I would put your condescension away when you are speaking to him. It will work more to your favor.