A women that was rapped, should be number one on the scale which is okay, but a woman that is using abortion for birth control should be label the highest number, which should be ilegall for her
2006-10-15 12:46:35 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
when I say put a label on abortion, I mean for a the law to put a label for abortion since abortion is legal
2006-10-15 12:51:18 · update #1
for the law to put a scale on abortion since abortion is legal
2006-10-15 12:52:19 · update #2
No. Abortion is abortion. You can't tell one woman what to do with her body, and then turn around and tell another woman what she can't do.
2006-10-15 12:49:02 · answer #1 · answered by not2nite 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You get into very murky territory when you want to set a firm boundary by some kind of ranking system. Let's just look at the health aspect. Some people are proposing that abortion should only be allowed in cases where the mother would be in mortal danger. What about those who would not be killed but might be paralyzed by it? And if you want to get right down to it, childbirthing is dangerous. It's possible for even the healthiest woman to die in childbirth. So how do you draw the line? Who will you condemn?
2006-10-15 19:54:28 · answer #2 · answered by Phil 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well god didnt mean for people to run around raping so they could get there jollies because they cant get them any other way. yes i think there should be a scale. it should be very precise though, and maybe a polygraph test along with it. abortion is wrong for someone who just doesnt want to deal with a kid, but if a baby being born is going to be already addicted to crack, or have aids or something that is going to torture it his whole life, well i dont know about anyone else but if it was me that was the baby i would probably tell the doctor thank you. they do need to have a less graphic way of doing it though.
2006-10-15 19:56:41 · answer #3 · answered by reeper_001 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I agree that some reasons are better than others for abortion. But in your second case, what if the woman were very ill and needed surgery, should she then no abort and leave her other kids motherless?
2006-10-15 19:49:21 · answer #4 · answered by kny390 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no abortion should be permitted. If God permitts a women to become pregnant because of rape, she could put the baby up for adoption, cause there's someone out there that would love that baby reguardless, and i totally understand why the woman wouldn't want to keep the baby so let someone else have the blessing of raising the child.
2006-10-15 19:51:30 · answer #5 · answered by Texas T 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
As stated in your question I agree with you.
Being a man I really have no say though.
Women that do not need/want this, are not subject to it.
The women that need this procedure really need it to be as safe as possible.
2006-10-15 19:53:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No form of abortion should exist, God didn't make us to end up killing our babies, now I would be sorry for the girl who got raped and had baby, but just put the baby up for adoption? whats wrong with that? Baby killers...
2006-10-15 19:49:45 · answer #7 · answered by Christopher 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No. It has to stay the same across the board for everyone.
2006-10-15 19:51:55 · answer #8 · answered by ReeRee 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋