English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

29 answers

I am against BOTH.
I do not believe that if you are illegal and have a baby here, that the baby should be granted AMERICAN status and citizenship.
Those laws need to change.

2006-10-15 12:42:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

I'm against illegal immigrants having anchor babies.

Illegal means Not legal!

2006-10-15 12:46:56 · answer #2 · answered by just visiting 5 · 3 0

Yes I am. I happen to know two lovely women (and they are very nice) who happen to be from Eastern Europe. They came here for summer internships (working at local hotels/restaurants) with a man from their country--who impregnated both of them prior to their departure from home. They were not obviously pregnant when they arrived, but timed it perfectly to deliver a few months before their visas expried. One of the girls married him after the birth of their son--so now he is able to stay as well. They're great people-and I like them a lot, but I don't approve of their methods. To their credit, they are hard working, honest and kind people. However, I do believe they should be sent home to return legally and fairly. It is sad that the kids would be uprooted (they both have wonderful little boys) but they cheated--and there are so many more who have been waiting to get here legally, On the up side for them and their children--they can give their kids some great insight on their heritage while they wait to return.

2006-10-15 12:51:07 · answer #3 · answered by Cherie 6 · 0 0

I am for the law. That means illegal aliens should be deported and anchor babies are allowed to stay because they're citizens.

2006-10-15 13:13:20 · answer #4 · answered by remmo16 4 · 2 0

Illegal immigrants, and I don't think citizenship should be granted to a child of two illegals. But I am not against babies of any kind.

2006-10-15 12:41:39 · answer #5 · answered by DJ 6 · 5 0

there isn't any longer something cool in any respect approximately anchor toddlers.and that i might such as you to be attentive to Im no longer an anchor toddler.My grandmother on my mothers area became finished blood Choctaw indian,my different ancestors got here the felony way.they did no longer leap an border and then anticipate anybody else right here to look after them.They fought for the marvelous to be noted as human beings, in each and every conflict as much as this modern-day one with Iraq.Its human beings such as you that twist the fact approximately anchor toddlers,its a typical fact that illegals come right here purely for the welfare that we supply those toddlers and it should be stopped.

2016-12-16 08:17:17 · answer #6 · answered by mcgeehee 4 · 0 0

I am against amnesty for illegal aliens and those that conveniently have multiple kids in America to get them citizenship rights. Their countries need to support the poor and stop this insane notion that jobs and starvation will go away in America. When illegal aliens come over here, they are just adding to the poor in our Nation and disrespect the country I love.

2006-10-15 12:50:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Anchor babies are illegal immigrants and they just don't know it yet

2006-10-15 12:47:43 · answer #8 · answered by spyderman131 3 · 3 0

I'm against the illegal part.

2006-10-15 12:41:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Both, I don't think children born to non citizens should automatically be a citizen if born here, it is absurd. And all the more so if those non citizens are here illegally!

2006-10-15 14:28:31 · answer #10 · answered by CM 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers