I am completely for it. Ya gotta test drive the car before ya buy it! lol
2006-10-15 12:31:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Whatever 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
For:
1) Sex is a completely natural activity for all species of animal, including humans.
2) Sex is an pleasurable activity for both sexes.
3) Sex is a non-violent activity between two people.
Against:
1) Unprotected Coital contact can spread disease.
2) Can result in unwanted pregnancies
3) Against the law in some places & countries.
4) Fear of a "God" can produce irrational mental illnesses.
2006-10-15 12:46:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe the choice belongs to the individual but I will say that to maintain a good marriage or relationship it has to be good on all levels and that includes being sexually compatible. If one waits and one finds out after marriage they are not sexually compatible it will lead to problems in the relationship and maybe a divorce which can impact more than the couple if they have children. If you find you aren't sexually compatible before making what most hope to be a permanent commitment, then one has the option of ending it there.
2006-10-15 12:38:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by genaddt 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No way. I'm for it. It goes back to a crude saying, "You test drive a car before buying it." A couples sex life is very important to a relationship. If you and your partner are not compatable, then your relationship is likely to fail. I am not relegious, so I don't feel that premarital sex is a sin. Also, women grow into sex...it isn't good to begin with. They need to expriment and enjoy sex before marriage...so that its that much sweeter.
2006-10-15 12:35:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by smwonder00 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Just think of it this way, if your a virgin and your mate is not, every move they make is because they tried it with the one prior to you.... I believe God made sex to be an experience between man and wife, one, to show your discipline to God and yourself, but also to alleviate those excact issues in the bedroom. When you give part of your inner most self to another, you cannot get it back. I speak from experiance, my wife and I both were active before marriage and we both wish we could go back and stay pure. Your just lying if you wear white on your wedding day and your not a virgin.
2006-10-15 12:54:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by pressersf 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
years ago this subject was a major NO NO one must grow and understand the ways of people and their decisions and be open and not judge other people and what they do with their personal life's...... so i say let each person makes their decision on premartial sex relations.....
HOWEVER, i am against teenagers having relations, i do not think they should be doing this until they are more mature and at least 18 years old...and i understand that my thoughts and feelings are not a factor...and teens will do what they want to.....
2006-10-15 12:46:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by walterknowsall 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes because I believe that premarital sex cheapens the experience. I believe sexual intercourse is a spiritual communion between husband and wife. Comparing the two is like comparing a bologna sandwich with a Prime Rib Dinner.
2006-10-15 12:32:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Debra M. Wishing Peace To All 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
No not at all. Sex is such a natural thing, and at times it can be dangerous to suppress it. I think though it should be between 2 consenting people mature enough to know what they are doing.
2006-10-15 12:33:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Premarital sex is a watered down word for serial polygamy.
2006-10-15 12:32:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bimpster 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes 1Corinthians 6:9
2006-10-15 12:33:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋