Should the US continue to find new oil deposit or start delveloping new energy sources?

Question

give reasons why ...

Answer 1

US invested 80 Billion on the war on Irak! I gues if such money was to be invested on technology development or simply reasearch and development we would much closer to saving the world from all the hazard that oil brings to the environment and to the people of the world. Say you pay for oil they ll buy Atomic bombs because they do not feel safe without it in the first place as it happens that they have oil and in that case those who need it normally would like to take controll , even by force.
See need new energy sources to keep as all safe and live better lifes on al the grounds mentioned above.

Answer 2

The time has come to implement a crash program to develop alternative fuel for heat and transportation. Renewable items like solar and wind can produce without harming the environment but are not convertible to transportation needs. People need to give up on oil except for lubricants and synthetics. There was a time it was thoughtless to think of living without coal but time has changed that. Someday in the not too distant future oil will go the same way as coal. One item that is not lacking in this country is imagination and also inventiveness. We are lucky to have the diverse knowledge to produce better products for the future. Instead of working on faster computers and smaller cell phones the business world should concentrate on alternative fuels. The rewards will be much greater for everyone.

Answer 3

Neither. Or both. It doesn't really matter. In today's world, it's not about one country's technology versus anothers. The real method of influence and control is through trade. If Germany discovers a clean, cheap, and efficient fuel, they can't keep it among themselves. How are they going to make money that way? As the world's dominant country, all the US has to do is keep its economic ties with its allies, and everything will work out for the better.

Answer 4

Well, we should be doing both, but I'm under the impression that alternate energy technologies are being suppressed. The rulers of this world are manufacturing an oil shortage in order to keep prices high, and to start world war 3. That way they can make money both ways, and it's a win win situation for them.

Answer 5

We should develop new energy sources. There would be a great affect on the economy, more jobs more research dollars, and income. Oil is finite - there are only so many deposits in the world, and the US doesn't control/have any.

Answer 6

This is not a one or the other situation. We can and should develop ALL available energy sources. If you need that explained, you won't understand the explanation. That was not in insult, just a statement of fact.

Answer 7

As long as there is oil on this planet you can forget

new energy sources.The oil companies own all of the technology anyway for renewable energy sources.

$$ & profits over the welfare of the planet.

Answer 8

If we hope to keep up with other advanced countries of the world, we had better start dumping money into alternative energy. Hopefully we can make some headway once w goes back to texas.

Answer 9

concept i could throw my hat interior the ring by utilising saying, the reason they spend plenty on plastic surgical treatment is the medical doctors fee way too plenty, and that they might not choose plastic surgical treatment if society wasn't so judgmental on how human beings look. We as a society have created this concern alongside with many others, and once you communicate approximately how plenty you have given and boast approximately it, you have in simple terms have been given your advantages as Christianity teaches, so no i would not carry on with on your footsteps, that's sin in accordance to the Bible. On a certainty sense i can tell if the wealthy or nicely to do helped the detrimental and needy, we could all in simple terms be mediocre, and that's quite like communism, something i'm to not stupid approximately, yet wait you probably did not say the detrimental could could desire to artwork we could in simple terms supply it to them and help them out. i think of we already do this, its referred to as social suggestions and our taxes cover that fee alongside with generating jobs for social workers. So we are already giving to the detrimental, we in simple terms are actually not boasting with regard to the forged we are doing. genuine charity comes from the middle and is not measured by utilising the media and what others think of, it quite is accomplished in secret so which you do not humiliate the needy or crown the giver.

Answer 10

Should do both. First if they find new oil then it will mean less they have to get from OPEC. If new energy sources are found again less dependant on OPEC.