do you any for evolution? of course you can find evidence for the Exodus's, prophecies coming true, the nation of Israel being still here. all the nations God said He would destroy are gone. including Babylon not being rebuilt.
2006-10-15 10:37:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by rap1361 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because only the act of observation can fix light in space or time as shown by the double slit experiment, would it be fair to say we are the only people in the universe? Probably not. Even though we can see to the edge of time and space with our telescopes we would be foolish to assume that we are fixing all light in space or time. So the question becomes, can we identify other observers? Not by looking directly at them but by looking for missing light that we know should be there we can fairly say that someone/thing has fixed it before our act of observation occurred. We can see a large scale examples of this scattered throughout the universe. In the center of most galaxies there resides super massive black holes that collect all the information contained within the galaxy, whether in the form of light or matter. If one were to hypothesize about a creator, this would be a good place to consider looking as it makes an ideal location for a creator to observe his creation on a universal scale. Just as a micro-biologist would set up isolated cultures in petri dishes in the lab, it would make sense for a creator to set up isolation galaxies in the universe. Only instead of a dish, the vastness of space itself insures the isolation of the cultures. From the massive to the micro, black holes abound throughout the universe, acting like vacuums, sucking up all information contained within the universe at some point or another. So, having said all that, if your really interested in looking into the eye of god, point your telescope into the heart of the galaxy. But be warned. There lies the eater of souls
2006-10-15 10:47:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The anthropic idea notes that the universe appears impossibly advantageous-tuned for life. If any of the large-spread constants were even slightly diverse - in besides in any respect - be it gravity, electromagnetism, the weak and strong atomic forces, then the universe can be a significant disordered hydrogen cloud that not in any respect plasmified, or the universe might want to be an empty darkness of black holes. the opportunities that this universe also ought to be here are infinitesimally small. upload in the prospect of a life-emitting universe, and the opportunities flow a concepts longer; in truth the opportunities are very nearly non-existent. The anthropic idea provides in difficulty-free words 3 options: a million. it is a unmarried universe in a limiteless multiverse. If we exist in a multiverse circuitously, than this in basic terms so occurs to be that one uncommon universe that got here out in a way that would want to emit life. when you consider that this proposition can neither be verified or falsified, it has the very similar probability of being authentic as God is. 2. The universe by some ability, adversarial to all odds, managed to expose out in this impossibly advantageous-tuned way. it is fairly not likely that it is the case. 3. The universe replaced into pretty meant (and led to) to exist. this may neither be shown nor falsified. notwithstanding it is between the in difficulty-free words 2 conceivable options. (the different is #a million above.) So briefly - there is both a God, or there's a multiverse. Neither might want to be shown. both require faith, might want to you provide it credence. yet neither are both of those options not likely. both of them.
2016-12-04 20:59:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by veloso 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let's see, do I have empirical(physical) data that God a non-physical thing exists? NO That's like asking exactly how many feet long the color blue is. Not everything that exists can be measured by the scientific method.
2006-10-15 10:34:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by westfallwatergardens 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is no 'god'.
You know, I cannot for the life of me understand why this question would get the thumbs down from anyone.
Oh, wait. Yes I can. The Christians don't like when legitimate questions are asked about their god.
2006-10-15 10:51:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
of course little piggy!!
Check out the movie created by Quantum Physicists.
Its called "What the Bleep Do We Know"
Its about the modern movement in the modern scientific community towards God.
Basically by studying the unseen energy of the earth, quantum physicists can prove there is a God.
Although they will not say which one because this breaks scientific codes of conduct.
You can rent it at Blockbuster!
It is a good introduction into quantum physics and the modern scientific study of God!
Take care!
2006-10-15 10:36:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by the nothing 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Do you have any empirical data (not anecdotal) or evidence to prove that New York exists?
2006-10-15 10:33:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
No, but I have a lot of data that shows that gods are man made. To find such evidence, look into the history of each religion and look into human nature as it applies to why we believe things.
2006-10-15 10:32:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by nondescript 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Dear Lil Piggy----since you are structuring your question in the legal tenor, I would remind you that, you first, must prove your prima facia case-----and show us empirical, conclusive, and evidence beyond a shadow of a doubt---or at least in the preponderance of the law----that he doesn't exist.
2006-10-15 10:33:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by thepeskywabbit 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
think about it; if there was any empirical evidence that God exists; then everyone would believe, and we would not have this conversation; this is question is a sort of paradox, isnt it?
2006-10-15 10:34:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by dalilvr333 3
·
2⤊
0⤋