2006-10-15 07:51:39 · 24 answers · asked by John16 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
Well, he is an extreme far left liberal and I am extreme far right conservative, and I don't want to say anything bad about him, so looking at the 2 different positions we hold, you can get my answer from that.
2006-10-15 07:56:02 · answer #1 · answered by shewz27 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'm glad Michael Moore is out there to reveal information that wouldn't otherwise be revealed by and about the government. He reveals information that people need to know to make informed decisions about what the government does. However, from an artistic viewpoint some of his movies aren't very good. They tend to ramble on and on and sometimes ask questions that they don't answer.
2006-10-15 20:26:25 · answer #2 · answered by Donna Knight 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I believed in him when he came out with roger and me and then bowling for columbine. I was actually a big fan. I even believed farenheit 9/11 until I looked into 9/11 for myself. I couldn't believe how badly he'd whitewashed the 9/11 story. I felt so betrayed. I just want to know WHY he whitewashed it. Was it for money? Was he threatened to not tell the whole story? If it was for money, then he is a shill. If it was because he was threatened, then he is a shill and a coward. I would like to know why, but I really don't care. A shill is a shill and his credibility is totally shot. I expect politicians to lie to me, but for some stupid reason, I trusted the guy. I do have to say that at least I've learned a lesson from Michael Moore: Don't trust ANYONE who poses as a 'truth-teller' without checking the facts for yourself.
To sum up, Michael Moore is a waste of skin. He's about as trushtworthy as Bush.
2006-10-15 15:08:28 · answer #3 · answered by Ron T 1 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I hate micheal moore he is a liberial supporter who lies and twist the truth for the rest of his liberial friends and blames 9/11 on Bush when in reality 9/11 should not be blamed on any body it was a tragedy.
2006-10-15 14:57:41 · answer #4 · answered by Captin Picard 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He's a whale who bites the hand that feeds him; he has a lot negative to say about America, but in very few other countries would he get away with maligning that country as he has gotten away with it here.
2006-10-15 21:11:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is it necessary to have an opinion about IT? Do you have an opinion about crap or garbage or trash or anything left over from a whatever?
2006-10-18 20:51:10 · answer #6 · answered by Mr.Been there 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Someone who does not want to have the truth know when it comes to his fakeumentaries! He is also a sore loser that likes to spread hate towards people who do not hold to his political views.
2006-10-16 01:26:23 · answer #7 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rosie O'Donnell look alike. Might even share some of the same interests.
2006-10-15 15:13:49 · answer #8 · answered by gizzardout 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He's probably one of the few American directors who tries to get to the bottom of things. I find his documentaries very informative, specially since Americans in general are not so informed about what goes on in the world. He can sometimes be a bit too much but we can forgive him for that. The pity is that people who are interested in his movies already know about the issues and people who should see his movies and get some information do not usually do so.
2006-10-15 15:05:18 · answer #9 · answered by sunny s 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
He's one of the few who still has the stones to speak his mind AND back it up with facts in spite of the death threats from the administration (indirectly of course). He's a brave man. So is Olberman. It's like Nazi Germany. Even German people were executed or worse for not complying. Every time I express my views on here I expect a knock at the door.
2006-10-15 15:02:51 · answer #10 · answered by shermynewstart 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋