Lev 11:9-12
2006-10-15 07:37:29 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
This was abomination to Israel. He never stated that shellfish was abomination to Him.
Apparently, shrimp seems to be an abomination to you??
2006-10-15 07:39:28 · answer #1 · answered by Southern Apostolic 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe "it" said shrimp were an abomination 'cause "it" ate bad shrimp once, and got really sick. But then, one day, "it" went to a good restaurant, like Phillips Seafood, and got some really good shrimp, and decided maybe the ban was a bit hasty?
Maybe God just needs to get out more =)
**hope you don't mind the copy and paste from the last question**
2006-10-15 14:41:32 · answer #2 · answered by ♥Mira♥ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go back to manuscrpt before greek/english and latin version.
Back to Hebrew and read that translation.
Then apply it to who it was transliterated too.
Health law were Mosiac ordinances- correct.
Did any Mosiac law apply to Gentiles (we the pagan-heathen)?
God can speak to one person about somethings that has no
application to another person.
First we know that God does not change- unchanging.
So you can go from there-what did God mean and what was his intentions with those health law.
Are you semetic?
What you harping about>
2006-10-15 14:47:02 · answer #3 · answered by cork 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no... the kosher laws were for a specific people for a specific time...
just as they were in a sense specially chosen, they were to be specially choosey about their food according to these rules where they avoided eating 'oddball animals like shrimp or ostrich or sea critters without fins or scales
its like a wedding ring... its meant for a specific person
it was not a rule for all people for all time
2006-10-15 14:44:39 · answer #4 · answered by whirlingmerc 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is a differance in an abomination to God and an abomination to Israel.
oh and we had pork for dinner today.
o:)NA
2006-10-15 14:42:26 · answer #5 · answered by Noble Angel 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never said it was bad for them to exist (they are a creation of God after all). Just that it might not be such a good idea to eat them (considering they are bottom-feeders).
2006-10-15 14:44:46 · answer #6 · answered by pax_rock2004 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm worried about what Buddha would think of sushi.
2006-10-15 14:41:38 · answer #7 · answered by a_delphic_oracle 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
After Jesus all food is clean and one can eat anything they wish.
2006-10-15 14:40:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anthony M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but Christians did.
2006-10-15 14:46:15 · answer #9 · answered by October 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YO DARWIN
TAKE A NAP.........
2006-10-15 14:39:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋