English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1.Bush allowed Israil to decimate Lebanon and thousand's of civilians for a cover to bring in tons of arms and military.
2.This assault was planned in 2001 according to Gen. Wesley Clark.
Syria, Sudan,Somali, Libya, and Iran are also part of the plan.
This accounts for Bush not wanting to pull troops out of Iraq, and actually sending more troops to the middle east.

2006-10-15 06:07:07 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

22 answers

THIS secret "prize" is the reason Bush does not want to pull troops out of Iraq and is actually sending more troops to the Middle East!...
http://www.strayreality.com/Lanis_Strayreality/iraq.htm

2006-10-17 07:24:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

First of all, I get that you don't like Bush. I also understand that you feel that his plans are the work of the devil.

I am not taking away from your opinion, because you absolutely have a right to your opinion...about ANYTHING.

However, take your opinion out of your question, and ONLY ask the question.

Facts are more of what is needed within any of these questions., and by you giving some "basic" facts (as opposed to facts AND your opinion) it will help others come to a decision about what you asked.

Their answers will be based on your facts then instead of your opinions.

Again, it is not that you have an opinion..as with fingers and toes, we all have them...but your personal beliefs don't need to be included with the question.

BTW, I don't think that Bush is real smart, (I have listened to some of his speeches) but I have no idea if HE (and his plans) might start WW 3. (or 4 as you mentioned, but I have no idea when we had WW 3.)

Good luck!

Sandy

2006-10-15 06:20:34 · answer #2 · answered by Dune 2 · 1 0

WOW!!! WW3 went real fast, must have been one of those overnight things. lol

Oh and Lebanon has been trying to take over Israel for a while now and Israel just got tired of it. Israel did have a right to defend itself. We did not ship anymore troops in under the pretense of taking out those other countries. The plan you are referring to was the plan on the war on terrorism, and at the time those were considered terrorist harboring countries. Now we know that N. Korea is just a nuisance, and that the other two really want nothing to do with this war.

2006-10-15 07:56:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1st of all Israel were attacked first 2nd they actually warned Lebanon that they were going to do it They even droped flyers over Lebanon asking them to stop there violence against them that is showing a hell of alot of patience if u ask me 3rd Lebanon actually elected a terrorist group to lead them a group of people who want all jews,Christians , and any one who doesent belive the same as them dead, 4th Bush is smart for sending more troops to the mid east because anti Americanism and extremism has spread like a cancer in that region and we ignored it for far to long Clinton just swept it all under the rug and pretended that it didnt exsist in the mean time he allowed those terrorist groups to grow and take controll when something could have easily been done to stop it back then He had 9 chances to kill Bin Laden but didnt because he was worried about the muslim vote. Now Bush has to take the heat for mistakes that were made long before he was in office we should have invaded Iraq 15 years ago if we had maybe by now we would have a great democratic ally in the east to help us fight other groups overthere that intend America harm

2006-10-15 06:29:49 · answer #4 · answered by josh h 2 · 1 0

Do you think the disgusting Bush and his devilish plans to take out Iran,Syria,and N. Korea with start W.W.4 ? WE'RE TIRED!
1.Bush allowed Israil to decimate Lebanon and thousand's of civilians for a cover to bring in tons of arms and military. IRAN/PASDARAN DIRECTED HEZBOLLAH TO START THAT, AND THEY DID-HEZBOLLAH HID IN POPULATED AREAS-MOST STRIKES WERE STILL SURGICAL.
2.This assault was planned in 2001 according to Gen. Wesley Clark. LOOK UP OPERATION POLO STEP, OPERATION BADGER, N.KOREAS DISMISSAL OF ALL OF THEIR AGREEMENTS WITH THE U.N., AND SEP 11, 2001
Syria, Sudan,Somali, Libya, and Iran are also part of the plan.
This accounts for Bush not wanting to pull troops out of Iraq, and actually sending more troops to the middle east. WHERE WE ARE AT, WITH BEHIND LINE SUPPORT, ISRAEL COULD TAKE OUT ALL 5 OF THOSE ABOVE MENTIONED COUNTRIES THEMSELVES, WE'D HAVE TO FIND SUPPORT TO HOLD POSITION AFTER FINISHED THOUGH-IF NEED BE, THAT IS. WE DO NOT THINK IT IS FAIR TO TRADE THOUSANDS OF IMPRISONED TERRORISTS FOR A FEW UNJUSTLY KIDNAPPED ISRAELI SOLDIERS. WE DO NOT THINK IT IS FAIR TO KILL INNOCENT PEOPLE IN IRAQ WHO JUST WANT A MUCH BETTER LIFE THAN THEY HAD. WE DO NOT DEAL WITH TERRORISTS. WE ARE TIRED. SHUT YOUR SKEWED RATIONALIZING MOUTH AND REALIZE WE ARE NOT PLAYING A PSYCHOLOGICAL GAME-THIS ISN'T GOING TO BE ANOTHER "MOTHER OF ALL WARS" IT IS GOING TO BE THE STRIKE OF A COBRA ON A SMARMY, LYING MAYMOONS NECK.

2006-10-15 20:27:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

9/11 become the fault of our regulation enforcement and intel centers, they have been so being conserving their very own jurisdictions and hiding issues from one yet another that they could no longer be troubled to genuinely guard the country. Clinton tried, and become blocked via the GOP Congress from beginning up variations that would possibly have prevented it, so as that one is the GOPs fault if no longer Bush's individually. North Korea has been brazenly proclaiming that is reason to become a nuclear us of a for years, Bush knew that and disregarded it, in simple terms as he disregarded the nuclear application in Iran, in his attempt to instruct Iraq right into a U.S. puppet regime interior the midsection East. He destroyed our economic device and our international status to boot as any credibility we had as a ethical and in simple terms human beings. The GOP is claiming that the reality that Bush's mess is larger than every person predicted and could take way longer to freshen up than Obama might have probable expected proves that he, Bush, did no longer make any blunders in any respect.

2016-10-19 10:44:28 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Where you been? WW 3 has already began. Did old Wesley not tell you that Clinton and Bush were in cohoots many years ago and that it was all planned that Bill would not go in and get Osama Bin Laden so the blame could be put on him for 9/11 and the chain reaction started from there. In effect, that disgusting Clinton is responisble for WW3.

2006-10-15 07:23:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You forgot the aliens from Area 51. The last I looked Lebanon was doing fairly well with only a slight case of civil war,neither side displaying any love for Israel. Besides from what I have seen the shrub doesn't have any plans, just anbitions.

2006-10-15 19:16:49 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 1 0

1 isreal was openly attacked by "hezbolah" whom of which contorol almost all aspects of lebabon territory.
2 It is impossible for america not to get involved, the united states is the only industrial nation that will move in to stop or control any conflict, since the UN soliders and taskforces are all controlled by isolationist nations. (we haven't had ww3 even)
3 how do you know for sure that the presidential administration planned this move, since it was in response to fundementalist extremist muslim nations who love war and bloodshed and will do anything to destroy israel and it's allies.

2006-10-15 06:58:04 · answer #9 · answered by Euclid 1 · 1 0

LOL! I love everyone else's answers so far - I don't even need to answer. ha ha.

Souvenier from WW3 - ha ha! I didn't get one either!!

Seriously, you sound alittle bitter. You know, hatred is like swallowing poison and hoping the other person dies. Not very wise my friend.

2006-10-15 06:10:24 · answer #10 · answered by ckphilly 2 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers