U.S. population hitting 300 million mark...?

Question

The paper says U.S. population will surpass 300 million in a few days and will hit 400 million in 2050. At what point do we start starving because land is not getting any larger yet our population is exploding.

Answer 1

The United States has vast amounts of untapped land and resources. We cannot support an unlimited population, but we are a long ways from critical mass. Further, I would not say that we are in the midst of a population explosion. The largest sustained growth in the birth rate was the Baby Boom era which ended in 1964. People are actually having less children now in this country. As far as increases in population due to immigration, this can be controlled and is being hotly debated everywhere you look these days. If you want to examine an out of control population look to China where births are actually regulated by law.

Answer 2

Most families of Americans born in America are 2 children or less. So, the population growth in the USA is to a large extent due to immigration and the larger family sizes of recent immigrants.As someone pointed out, this is controllable.

The USA has a lot (not a huge amount, but a lot) of land which could, in a pinch, be used for food production. And it is very true, as another person says here, that cutting down on meat consumption saves a lot of land (because eating grain is much more food-efficient than eating animals that were fed on grain).

On the other hand, we do have a lot of farmland in the USA going out of production because homes, roads and businesses are being built on suburban land that was formerly great farmland (as in New Jersy - formerly the "Garden State", right? And, we are greatly over-using the water supplies int he whole western USA. Lots of areas are having water supply problems. You can't run a modern industrialized agriculture system without lots of irrigation - food is, after all, mainly water ( even dry grain is about half water).

With thoughtful management, our agriculture should be OK to supply us with food for a lot more people than we have now, provided we dont poison the soil, and provided that we pay more attention to preserving and protecting our water supplies than we do now.

Answer 3

Hmmm...enable's see. at the instant, we've a coarse inhabitants of 320 or so million human beings in this us of a. because of fact we a greater progressed us of a, we can enhance in inhabitants very slowly. (case in point, look on the turn area and look at India or China. those are much less progressed international places, yet have a inhabitants of a million billion or so human beings.) the a number of components that make a contribution to our slower growth is technologies. we've the certainty and the flexibility to furnish us, case in point, contraceptive technologies and we additionally understand how infants are conceived. additionally, i think we understand that a much bigger kin would not unavoidably mean a much bigger artwork tension. case in point, the Hispanics have super households, yet that in simple terms ability greater mouths to feed and supply for. (i do no longer want to sound racial or something right here). those are basically a pair components that bring about a slower inhabitants growth. notwithstanding, on the different hand, we genuinely have a reasonably severe migration inflow. no longer basically from the South, yet from different international places to boot. With those diverse ones coming in, they do enhance the inhabitants. Bah. i do no longer think of I replied your question on the dot, yet i'm hoping you enjoyed a number of those info. ^_^

Answer 4

Kick out the 50 million illegal immigrants.

Answer 5

Don't know obviously but that date can be put off by centuries if Americans ate less and particularly ate less meat.

Answer 6

what was the population of usa in 1964?

Answer 7

Glad I will have died of old age by then.