2006-10-15 04:51:02 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The evidence of Gautam Buddha is far more.
1)For starters he was born to a royal family and renonced his riches at a young age and went out to seek the mening of life.
2) Entire China, Japan, India have thousands of Old manuscripts, tablets and other writings which refer to Buddha
3) Buddhism had also spread to areas of modern day Pakistan and Afghanistan.
2006-10-15 05:07:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Buddha has more historical evidence but I believe Jesus lived as well. Both were prophets.
2006-10-15 04:55:26 · answer #2 · answered by a_delphic_oracle 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think the circumstantial evidence for Buddha is pretty overwhelming. A new religion and texts didn't just emerge out of thin air. The evidence for Jesus is less but enough to suggest that he really did exist.
2006-10-15 04:54:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
There is practically no DIRECT extra-scriptural evidence of either Jesus' or Siddhartha Gautama's existence historically. In neither case do we possess any contemporary accounts, and in both cases the archeological record is all but silent as regards the men themselves. The indirect information we do have is so completely overlaid with legend that the original historical kernel of truth is practically inextricable. We may as well try to ascertain the historical personage behind the Aladdin legend.
Now prepare for everybody else to argue for their favorite Idol.
2006-10-15 04:58:49 · answer #4 · answered by jonjon418 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
both existed. thats a actuality. in case you research, budha is larger than god. no god can stand before him. thats the variety of personality budha replaced into. he knew what he spoke, everythng from his personal journey. kindness, love, compassion and so on were truly positioned practice first by technique of budha. jesus had suggested a similar issues some 500 years later. it is a trifling repetition of what budha suggested. jesus has no contribution of his personal. thats the tragedy of christianity. some christians claims all different non secular personalities are a delusion. it truly is a significant lie which the church on a similar time as we talk propogates. evaluate this - how human beings joined christ as followers throughout his life. handful. probable those twelve fools who calls themselves the apostles. seem at budha - throughout his life time tens of millions joined hands with him. ofcourse, budha replaced right into a prince, human beings loved him and maximum of them were knowledgeable so that they conventional him and joined him quickly. it truly is a historic truth. hindus settle for that section as many hindus conventional budhism throughout budha's lifetime itself. that would want to steer on to the idea that jesus replaced right into a introduction of mind's eye of those apostles or whoever began christianity. now it is for the readers to come back to a decision and flow whichever way they prefer to flow. mere writing in a holy e book received't suffice.
2016-12-04 20:43:07 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Buddha, but there are secular references to Jesus.
2006-10-15 04:53:28 · answer #6 · answered by Preacher 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Evidence found....evidence from each belief....evidence from outside observers? Could be buddhism, but christianity has alot more exposure. I cannot say, and I don't think anyone can truly know....there are too many places and times we have no information of
2006-10-15 04:54:54 · answer #7 · answered by TCFKAYM 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Jesus
2006-10-15 04:53:10 · answer #8 · answered by chrstnwrtr 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Buddha has a graves sight. Jesus doesn't.
So does Mohammed and other religious leaders.
Why hasn't anyone found Jesus grave sight?
2006-10-15 04:55:33 · answer #9 · answered by t_a_m_i_l 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Jesus I believe...there are alot of documents with him mentioned that aren't biblical texts.
But Budda has quite a few too. I believe he has many documents too.
2006-10-15 05:15:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋